- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Burn and Scald Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- Missouri City Personal Injuries
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Clear Lake Personal Injury Lawyer
- Deer Park Personal Injury Attorney
- Galveston Personal Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena Personal Injury Attorney
- Sugar Land Personal Injury Lawyer
- Texas City Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Deer Park Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Galveston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Pasadena Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Sugar Land Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Trucking Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Houston Fatal Truck Accident Attorney
- Galveston Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Sugar Land Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Conroe Truck Accident Lawyer
- Galveston 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Pasadena Truck Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Clear Lake Truck Accident Lawyer
- Deer Park Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Accident Lawsuits
- Texas City 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Auto Accident Attorney
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Clear Lake Car Accident Lawyer
- Galveston Car Accident Lawyer
- Houston Accident Attorney
- Houston Accident Injury Lawyer
- Houston Car Accident Lawyer
- Pasadena Car Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land Car Accident Lawyer
- Texas City Car Accident Lawyer
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- Houston Drunk Driver Accident Lawyer
- Dram Shop and Liquor Liability Cases in Houston
- Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents
- Galveston Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas Drunk Driver Accident Statistics
- Conroe Drunken Driver Accidents
- Pasadena Drunk Driving Accidents
- Sugar Land Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas City Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Attorney
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Pasadena Work Injury Lawyer
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- Houston Lifting Injury
- More...
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Galveston Work Injury Lawyer
- Sugar Land Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- Houston Trench Collapse Attorney
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Houston Fatal Car Accident Attorney
Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help You If You’ve Lost a Loved One on a Wrongful Death Automobile Accident

If you have lost a loved one or family member as a result of a fatal car accident, you may have merit in seeing justice served against a responsible party through a Houston wrongful death lawsuit.
The first thing you should be aware of prior to filing such a lawsuit is that it is nearly impossible for a non-attorney to win this type of case as they can be incredibly complex. An insurance company will work to deny your claim and aggressively fight to win a wrongful death case no matter how severe the injuries or the number of victims. A team of legal professionals who can even the playing field is what you need by your side. Houston fatal car accident attorney Michael Grossman from Grossman Law offices has the ability to fully explain the workings of wrongful death lawsuits. Furthermore, he has the experience required to bring to justice those that are responsible for your loved one's death.
What Damages Can a Plaintiff Seek for a Wrongful Death Lawsuit Following a Houston Fatal Car Accident?
There is no monetary amount that can ever truly compensate you for the loss of someone dear to you like a family member. The entire family can be impacted with such an emotional and sudden loss. The fact of the matter is, not only do you have an emotional crisis, the loss can also be extremely devastating financially, thus creating a burden for the family as a whole. After sustaining financial losses from a myriad of circumstances following the loss of your loved one, our attorneys will do everything in their power to make sure you receive proper compensation. Not only do we want to guarantee that your family does not suffer from the economic hardship due to your family member’s death, we also want to assist you with bringing the negligent parties to justice. The stakes are quite high in wrongful death lawsuits, and you will need proper representation in order to fight against highly skilled insurance adjusters and defense attorneys.
There are two types of damages in a comprehensive wrongful death lawsuit: survival damages and wrongful death damages. The child, spouse or parent of the deceased victim can seek out wrongful death damages. These cases seek compensation for a plaintiff and the plaintiff's financial losses as a result of the death of their loved one. Wrongful death damages include:
- The medical expenses paid prior to a victim's death if any exist.
- The expense of a funeral.
- The financial support that was lost which used to be provided by the victim.
- Emotional distress as a result of losing a family member and compensation for loss of companionship.
Survival damages are sought on behalf of the decedent. In other words, one family member “stands in” for the victim of the fatal auto accident in Houston. A spouse, parent, child, or, in some instances, a sibling, can sue for survival damages. Both survival damages and wrongful death damages can be sought by the same family member. However, whereas wrongful death damages can be sought by many family members for the loss of the same loved one, only one family member can seek survival damages. Survival damages include:
- Any medical expenses that were paid previous to the victim dying.
- Any wages the victim lost while they spent time at the hospital.
- The lost earning capacity that came as a result of a disability.
- The physical pain endured.
- Emotional and mental torment that was a result of the victim's injuries.

There is a unique legal approach required for each type of damages and they must be sought in a separate claim. Rest assured that our attorneys have the knowledge and experience necessary to cover all bases making sure your lawsuit is comprehensive and representative of the full extent of your incurred financial losses. Although this is a highly technical process, we are capable of handling it, and have helped hundreds of families through the emotionally-challenging process of seeking compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit in Texas for the last 20 years. Houston fatal car accident attorney Michael Grossman will work hard to ensure that proper compensation may be awarded so that you can get back to your recovery.
Do I Need an Attorney’s Help in Seeking Compensation Following a Fatal Car Accident in Houston, TX?
Initially, fatal car accidents may often not appear as complex as most of them really are. The potential damages, as far as how much money is on the line, may be quite large in a fatal car accident lawsuit. A ruthless case will likely be built against your loved one by the insurance company so that they don’t stand the opportunity to lose what could be a sizeable sum. Many factors may indicate a more complex lawsuit than initially thought such as:
- One, or possibly more, of the drivers that were part of the accident may not cooperate with parts of your investigation or respond to your questions.
- You may be hammered with questions about the accident or your family member by the insurance adjusters.
- Your statements are being requested to be recorded by the insurance adjusters. This is usually a huge sign that it is necessary for you to hire an attorney.
- You are asked to sign away your right to file a lawsuit by accepting a sum of money from the insurance company.
- Even though this is a fatal car accident case, your insurance company offers a small settlement.
- One, or possibly more, of the drivers that are part of the accident have insurance protection by a company that you have never heard of prior to this accident.
- One driver, or possibly more, that was involved in the accident does not have any type of insurance coverage.
- Your gut tells you your insurance claim is not being handled properly.
Insurance Company Tactics Following a Houston Fatal Auto Accident
There is a big possibility that the insurance company will challenge your claim, especially when a fatality is involved, since it will more than likely cost them a lot of money. You should be aware that insurance adjusters pose a large risk to your case. Consequently, hiring a Houston fatal car accident attorney to represent you in these types of situations can assist your family toward getting fair compensation and seeking justice against those responsible for your loss.
Many insurance adjusters may play on your family's emotions and take advantage of their grief after a fatal car accident, getting them to sign away their rights when their minds are not yet emotionally prepared. There is a big probability the insurance adjusters had knowledge of your loved one's death, even before you did. They may have no problem in asking difficult questions and requesting statements from family members at the hospital and the morgue. They know the chances that you have spoken to an attorney in the immediate aftermath of a fatal car wreck in Houston are slim. Their goal is to get you to sign your rights away before you have a chance to do so. Due to their own enormous amount of grief, many people are victim to this tactic due to unclear thinking. Houston fatal car accident lawyer Michael Grossman is concerned that this does not happen to you and does not wish for an insurance adjuster’s gimmicks to cause you to lose your right to seek justice.
In an ideal world, insurance companies would discuss the damages your loved one's death caused and a fair compensation settlement would be offered to you and your family to help cover your loss. This is rarely the case, especially for fatal car accident victims and their families. The goal of the insurance company is often to pay as little as possible and to work against a victim. Most people do not have total comprehension of how complex their case is until it is too late, and most insurance companies are successful against them due to this naïveté. Unfortunately, many cases may suffer from irreparable damage before victims and their families seek the help of an attorney. Don’t let this be the case with you. We can ensure your case is not damaged as a result of their underhanded tactics. Our experienced fatal car accident attorneys can negotiate on your behalf with these insurance adjusters. Since we’ve taken claims against nearly every major insurer in the country, they’re often well-aware of our law firm. Consequently, they won’t attempt their tactics on our clients that they might otherwise employ on unwitting or otherwise vulnerable family members who have lost a loved one in a Houston fatal car crash.
Houston Fatal Car Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Can Assist You
It is a mistake for family members of fatal car accident victims to think scare tactics work in regards to insurance companies offering a fair settlement by being threatened with a lawsuit. The truth of the matter is that insurance companies do not get scared by tactics of non-attorneys. The teams of defense lawyers that insurance companies have to represent them have been shutting down fatal car accident cases in court for years. The strength of your case holds no bearing when you do not know how to prove your damages, respond to a list of admissions, or submit a demand packet. Countless times, stories are shared with us of from people who have walked away with nothing because they attempted to represent themselves against these very experienced professionals.

On the other hand, our experienced Houston fatal car accident lawyers have the ability to get a fair settlement offered and know how to scare an insurance company by providing relevant evidence of their client’s culpability. We have helped victims and families of fatal car accidents seek justice for over 20 years. We have been successful against just about every major insurance company and defense firm in the nation, litigating lawsuits and handling hundreds of fatal car accident cases. In order for them not to have to face our attorneys in court, and because they are often aware of our successful track record, these organizations are often prone to offer our clients out-of-court settlements.
In order to uncover all possible defendants, a thorough investigation must be conducted. What was the cause of your family member’s accident? A defective tire? Someone who was drinking and driving? A broken traffic light? Multiple parties may be liable for your loved one's death, and we will assist you to bring comprehensive claims against all liable parties in every situation. You can be assured that we are dedicated to completely explaining the most complex subtleties in your case in upfront and honest terms so that you will know how to proceed and an informed decision can be made. It is our goal to assist you with bringing justice to those responsible for your loved one’s death. Contact Houston fatal car accident attorney Michael Grossman from Grossman Law offices today if you have lost someone in a fatal car accident. Free consultations are available to you at 1-855-392-0000 where you can discuss with us the specifics of your loved one’s fatal car crash in Houston, Texas. We are here to help you get the justice and compensation you deserve.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$25,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for the victim of a automobile accident.
Recovery for the victim of a automobile accident.
Total Recovery:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$8,250.00
$8,250.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for passenger of Uninsured Driver Injured in Head-On Crash.
Recovery for passenger of Uninsured Driver Injured in Head-On Crash.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$82,500.00
$82,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$70,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Neck & Back Injury)
(policy limits) Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back and neck injuries in a motor-vehicle accident.
(policy limits) Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back and neck injuries in a motor-vehicle accident.
Total Recovery:
$70,000.00
$70,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$23,333.00
$23,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$656.00
$656.00
$530,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Total Recovery:
$530,000.00
$530,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$210,000.00
$210,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$50,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Whiplash)
Recovery for client who sustained whiplash after being rear-ended in a car accident.
Recovery for client who sustained whiplash after being rear-ended in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,334.00
$5,334.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Broken Femur)
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$335,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$335,000.00
$335,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$134,000.00
$134,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$63,000.00
$63,000.00








