- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Burn and Scald Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- Missouri City Personal Injuries
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Clear Lake Personal Injury Lawyer
- Deer Park Personal Injury Attorney
- Galveston Personal Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena Personal Injury Attorney
- Sugar Land Personal Injury Lawyer
- Texas City Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Deer Park Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Galveston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Pasadena Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Sugar Land Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Trucking Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Houston Fatal Truck Accident Attorney
- Galveston Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Sugar Land Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Conroe Truck Accident Lawyer
- Galveston 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Pasadena Truck Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Clear Lake Truck Accident Lawyer
- Deer Park Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Accident Lawsuits
- Texas City 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Auto Accident Attorney
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Clear Lake Car Accident Lawyer
- Galveston Car Accident Lawyer
- Houston Accident Attorney
- Houston Accident Injury Lawyer
- Houston Car Accident Lawyer
- Pasadena Car Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land Car Accident Lawyer
- Texas City Car Accident Lawyer
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- Houston Drunk Driver Accident Lawyer
- Dram Shop and Liquor Liability Cases in Houston
- Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents
- Galveston Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas Drunk Driver Accident Statistics
- Conroe Drunken Driver Accidents
- Pasadena Drunk Driving Accidents
- Sugar Land Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas City Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Attorney
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Pasadena Work Injury Lawyer
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- Houston Lifting Injury
- More...
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Galveston Work Injury Lawyer
- Sugar Land Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- Houston Trench Collapse Attorney
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Houston Insurance Attorney
Houston Insurance Attorney Michael Grossman Explains Personal Injury Cases Involving Automobiles

Everyone needs a car as a vital way of getting around a large metropolis like Houston, but as a result of so many cars on the road, accidents inevitably result.
At Grossman Law Offices, Houston insurance attorney Michael Grossman and his associates 20 have compiled 20 years of experience litigating personal injury cases involving car accidents and the insurance claims resulting from accidents. We want to help you understand your legal rights and the obstacles you will have to overcome in order to secure a fair Houston accident settlement. If you have been injured due to someone else’s negligence behind the wheel, then you may be eligible to file a personal lawsuit and recover compensation for your lost income, past and future medical bill0, property damage and any emotional or mental anguish caused by the wreck. However, many car wrecks can be much more intricate than they appear at first, so you need the help of an experienced attorney to ensure the best chances of securing the compensation to which you are entitled.
Houston insurance attorney Michael Grossman and his associates want to help inform you about the issues involved with personal injury cases involving auto accidents, so that you can make the best decisions for you and your family. Hopefully, you will be able to determine whether or not you have a case and see just how helpful a skilled attorney can be in delivering Houston accidents settlements.
Do You Have a Personal Injury Claim Resulting From Your Accident?
In order for a car accident to be actionable with a personal injury claim, it must contain the following components:
- The victim suffered a physical, emotional or mental injury.
- Another liable party caused the victim’s injury with negligent behavior. In most car accidents, this usually means the liable party either caused the wreck directly with his or her negligence or indirectly contributed to the cause of the accident by negligently being part of a chain of events that led to the accident.
- The injury inflicted on the victim resulted in some form of monetary losses. The value of these financial setbacks is called damages. The purpose of a personal injury lawsuit is to allow the victim to recover compensation for the value of the injuries they have suffered.
If the circumstances of your accident meet these conditions, then in all likelihood, you have grounds for a personal injury lawsuit against the negligent party or parties. If you still cannot tell whether you have the right to seek compensation through such a civil suit, then contact the attorneys at Grossman Law Offices for a free consultation at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free). We are happy to answer any questions you may have and help you better understand your legal options. If you have suffered costly injuries due to somebody else’s negligence, then why should you be the one paying for it? By filing a personal injury lawsuit, you can recover the damages you’ve lost and get back to enjoying your life.
Do You Need a Lawyer?

In most car wrecks, the only thing damaged is property – the cars involved in the accidents. If that is the case in your accident, then you probably don’t need an attorney to file a claim with the insurance provider of the person who caused the wreck or your own insurance carrier for the purpose of getting your car repaired if it has been damaged or replaced if it has been totaled. If you have been injured in the wreck, on the other hand, it behooves you to contact a Houston insurance attorney as soon as you can. There are several signs that you can look for that indicate you need the protection of legal counsel in order to secure a Houston accident settlement:
- The driver who caused the accident responds with an aggressive attitude or is uncooperative after the wreck has happened.
- An insurance company wants to put you on the record answering a slew of difficult questions.
- Before the extent of your injuries is known or all of the facts have been established, an insurance company offers you a settlement.
- You lack health insurance and/or cannot afford to pay for medical treatment. (Grossman Law Offices can help you find medical treatment that permits you a payment plan you can afford).
- The insurance company offers you a settlement that does not adequately compensate you for the injuries you have incurred or the damage your car has sustained.
- The insurance company fails to provide a rental car as agreed upon in your policy.
- The liable party refuses to provide insurance information.
- The liable party names his or her insurer, but it’s a provider you have never heard of before.
- Your instincts tell you something is fishy in the compensation process.
After practicing personal injury law for 20 years, the Houston insurance attorneys at Grossman Law Offices have encountered countless anecdotes about how inexperienced accident victims have been left empty-handed due to the unscrupulous actions of drivers or their insurance carriers. We can provide you a knowledgeable and experienced team of attorneys who can protect your rights and make sure you receive the damages you deserve.
Obstacles to Recovering Compensation in Personal Injury Cases Involving Auto Accidents
The biggest challenge to securing the compensation you deserve after suffering injuries in a car accident will likely come from the aggressive insurance adjusters. Insurance companies are in business to make money – not help people recover from injuries. Thus, the higher the value of the monetary damages you have sustained, the harder the insurance adjusters will work to attempt to deny your claim or lessen the amount of settlement to which you agree. In order to do so, they will do whatever they can to make the victim appear as if he or she caused the accident with his or her own negligence. Even if they can’t make the victim appear to be the sole proximate cause of his or her own injuries, insurance companies can sometimes save millions of dollars in Houston accident settlements by making the victims appear partially liable for their own injuries. They view success by increased profits, not by satisfied injury victims.
What to do About Low-Ball Settlements Offers
Depending upon the circumstances of your accident, the insurance provider may offer a victim a settlement even before the victim hires an attorney. Be very leery of such an offer. Especially when victims lack legal representation, insurance companies will attempt to take advantage of them by offering an inadequate settlement and convincing the victim it’s in his or her best interest to resolve the case as quickly as possible. In these cases, the insurance company knows it could stand to lose considerably more money if the victim takes legal action, so they are only making the offer to save themselves money by taking it out of the victim’s pockets. The settlement they offer is usually far less than the total amount of the injuries the victim has sustained. Under no circumstances should you ever sign a document that waives liability or surrenders the right to sue in exchange for a settlement. If this is what the insurance company is offering you, then it’s because they know they stand to lose a lot more. If you sign such a document, no Houston insurance attorney can help you. A skilled and experienced attorney can protect you from such trickery and help you secure the compensation you deserve instead of just an insulting low-ball offer.
He Said, She Said

The next significant obstacle to personal injury claims involving car accidents comes from the tendency for different parties involved in an accident to disagree about how the accident occurred. If this is the case, you need the help of a Houston insurance attorney who has expertise in the art of investigating an accident scene to find the evidence than can prove the negligence of the other party. Without a trained eye, finding this evidence can be difficult or even impossible, leaving the victim to rely solely on their own testimony in court – that’s usually not enough to be successful, especially if the defendant has skilled attorneys working for him or her. As soon as we’re hired, our lawyers conduct a diligent investigation of the accident scene to determine all of the parties who caused the accident in whole or in part. We sequester and examine the vehicles involved, find and question witnesses, inspect forensic evidence like the distance between skid marks to the point of impact, scour police reports and search for any photographic of video evidence. We will find the critical evidence to support your version of the facts in the case, taking the onus off your word. By doing so, we provide our clients a better opportunity of receiving the equitable restitution they deserve for the harm that has been done to them.
Proving Up Dames and Convincing the Jury
While it may seem hard to believe because the victim is the injured party, there are certain circumstances in which a jury may not view the victim fairly and may not believe the extent of the injuries claimed by the injured party. Often with soft tissue injuries – whiplash, sprains and pulled muscles – are difficult for juries to accept on their face value. Although, these types of injuries can take months to recuperate and often lead to other injuries. You need the help of an experienced Houston insurance attorney who knows how to “prove up damages. ” In other words, if you have suffered a soft tissue injury, then you need a lawyer who is capable of convincing a skeptical jury of the true value of the injuries you have suffered. Over time, our attorneys have learned the importance of expert witnesses and strong physical evidence to sway even the most disbelieving jurors.
Possible Liable Parties
In many car accident cases, multiple parties either caused the wreck or contributed to its cause. If you were injured by a drunk driving, then both the driver and the drinking establishment that sold him or her the liquor could be liable. If a design or maintenance error caused your car accident, then the manufacturer or mechanic may be liable for your injuries. If more than one party is responsible for your accident, then you need to file separate lawsuits against every party to recover damages according to that party’s degree of negligence. The process of determining degree of liability is extremely complex, so only an experienced Houston insurance attorney can make sure all of the liable parties are held accountable for their negligence.
How Grossman Law Offices Can Help You If You’ve Been Involved in a Houston Auto Accident
Through a personal injury lawsuit, Houston insurance attorney Michael Grossman and his legal team at Grossman Law Offices want to help you get back on your feet and enjoying your life by securing the compensation you deserve after sustaining injuries in a car accident. While the legal process can be stressful and challenging, we can ease the pain and confusion by providing the following services:
- Allow you to concentrate on the healing process by handling all of the legal process.
- Buffer you from the insurance adjusters by handling all negotiations and questions.
- File the insurance claim or assume the procedure if the claim has already been filed.
- Conduct a thorough investigation, including: finding surveillance video and photos, locating key witnesses, collecting forensic evidence, examining police reports, securing data from any data logging equipment that may provide evidence, properly cataloging all evidence so it will be admissible in court.
- Making sure you find medical attention even if you lack insurance or the funds to pay for a doctor.
- Preparing demand packets to request compensation.
- Attempting to avoid the uncertainty of a trial by securing a fair compensation package in an insurance settlement.
- Always preparing a strong trial case and strategy regardless of whether or not a settlement is on the negotiating table.
Our attorneys are committed to doing everything within the confines of the law to ensure that our clients receive the compensation to which they are entitled. We will use our 20 years of experience to fight for your rights and secure the Houston accident settlement you deserve.
Is This a Do-It-Yourself Job?
By choosing to represent yourself, you are likely choosing failure with your personal injury claim. Granted, anyone can learn about the laws involved with any case by conducting a Google search, but you can’t use an Internet search engine to discover who to actually resolve your case. Success in the courtroom depends much more on the ability to investigate, plan a strong strategy, and then carry out that strategy by navigating the complex legal process than it does on knowledge of the law. Successfully attorneys must spend years in law school learning the law, but it’s the years they spend practicing the law that makes them formidable in court. Successful Houston insurance attorneys must know how to apply the law by following intricate procedure. Failure to follow the procedural requirements in any case can end up with the case being tossed out of court. In addition, an experienced attorney can use a strong track record of success to help guarantee future triumphs. We have resolved cases against every insurance carrier in the nation, so they often fear taking our lawyers to court and will offer a fair settlement to our clients pre-trial. By choosing to hire an experienced attorney, you will likely save yourself money in the long run by securing a more favorable settlement offer. With a sizable amount of money on the line, you shouldn’t risk the chance of ending up with nothing and having to recover from your injuries on your own.
Grossman Law Offices Can Help You

If you choose to tackle the legal process on your own, then you will likely end up empty-handed. Our Houston insurance attorneys have devoted the last 20 years of our lives to helping injured Texans, and we can help you overcome the unique challenges presented by your case, as well. If you or a family member has been injured in a car accident due to someone else’s negligence, then call us today at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) to find out how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$48,800.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Knee and Back Injury)
(policy limits + secondary claim) Recovery for victim who suffered knee and back injury due to a car accident.
(policy limits + secondary claim) Recovery for victim who suffered knee and back injury due to a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$48,800.00
$48,800.00
Attorney Fees:
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,188.00
$1,188.00
$187,500.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our firm was hired by a young woman who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler when she slowed for traffic in a construction zone. Initially, she attempted to represent herself and the insurance carrier offered roughly $1,000 to settle her case. She then contacted our firm and we filed suit soon after our initial investigation. The case was successfully resolved in litigation.
Our firm was hired by a young woman who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler when she slowed for traffic in a construction zone. Initially, she attempted to represent herself and the insurance carrier offered roughly $1,000 to settle her case. She then contacted our firm and we filed suit soon after our initial investigation. The case was successfully resolved in litigation.
Total Recovery:
$187,500.00
$187,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$61,875.00
$61,875.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$25,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for the victim of a car accident.
Recovery for the victim of a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$8,250.00
$8,250.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$95,035.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
Recovery for the father of a young man who was killed in a car accident.
Recovery for the father of a young man who was killed in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$95,035.00
$95,035.00
Attorney Fees:
$31,678.00
$31,678.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25.00
$25.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Work Injury (Facial Fractures and Head Trauma)
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$9,807.00
$9,807.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$370.00
$40,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Neck Injuries)
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue neck injuries in a car accident.
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue neck injuries in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$13,333.00
$13,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50.00
$50.00








