- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Burn and Scald Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- Missouri City Personal Injuries
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Clear Lake Personal Injury Lawyer
- Deer Park Personal Injury Attorney
- Galveston Personal Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena Personal Injury Attorney
- Sugar Land Personal Injury Lawyer
- Texas City Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Deer Park Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Galveston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Pasadena Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Sugar Land Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Trucking Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Houston Fatal Truck Accident Attorney
- Galveston Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Sugar Land Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Conroe Truck Accident Lawyer
- Galveston 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Pasadena Truck Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Clear Lake Truck Accident Lawyer
- Deer Park Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Accident Lawsuits
- Texas City 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Auto Accident Attorney
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Clear Lake Car Accident Lawyer
- Galveston Car Accident Lawyer
- Houston Accident Attorney
- Houston Accident Injury Lawyer
- Houston Car Accident Lawyer
- Pasadena Car Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land Car Accident Lawyer
- Texas City Car Accident Lawyer
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- Houston Drunk Driver Accident Lawyer
- Dram Shop and Liquor Liability Cases in Houston
- Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents
- Galveston Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas Drunk Driver Accident Statistics
- Conroe Drunken Driver Accidents
- Pasadena Drunk Driving Accidents
- Sugar Land Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas City Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Attorney
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Pasadena Work Injury Lawyer
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- Houston Lifting Injury
- More...
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Galveston Work Injury Lawyer
- Sugar Land Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- Houston Trench Collapse Attorney
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Houston Dram Shop Liquor Liability
The Attorneys at Grossman Law Offices Discuss Texas Dram Shop Law in Connection to Houston Drunk Driving Accidents

If you’ve been injured in a Houston drunk driving accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one due to the negligent behavior of a drunk driver in South Texas, you may be confused about your possible legal options in order to seek compensation as a result of your injury or loss.
In such instances, that is quite a normal response, as a vast majority of Texans are either unaware of the laws that govern civil liability in drunk driving accidents, or simply do not know who to turn to with their questions in their time of need. However, Houston drunk driving accident attorney Michael Grossman has spent the last 20 years ensuring that the rights of those affected by drunk drivers are defended. In the following informational article, we’ll present the facts regarding Texas dram shop law, why these types of laws exist in Texas, and how these dram shop laws may affect your personal injury or wrongful death case. After reading through the following information, you may contact our offices at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) for a free and private legal consultation with any further questions you may have regarding a drunk driving accident in Houston or another South Texas town. The drunk driving accident attorneys at Grossman Law Offices are here to help you through this likely trying and difficult time. By understanding the laws that often govern drunk driving accidents in Texas, you will have knowledge that can help you through the legal proceedings in order to seek just compensation for your injury or loss.
Who’s at Fault in a Houston Drunk Driving Accident?
The question of blame, also known as liability, is often the first issue investigated in a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. Such lawsuits must have a defendant, and the defendant is a person or entity responsible for violating their legal duty toward the plaintiff, or victim, resulting in the plaintiff incurring some type of financial loss, known as damages. The goal of a civil lawsuit is for the plaintiff to be compensated for that financial loss by the party responsible for that loss. As such, identifying the liable parties is the first necessary step in seeking compensation from such a negligent party. In drunk driving accidents, there can often be more then one liable party. At the outset, many people may be confused by this idea, assuming that the drunken driver is the sole party responsible for a drunk driving wreck. While that can be the case in some instances, such as when a person gets drunk at their house and then has a drunk driving wreck causing injury or loss of life, there are many more instances where a negligent alcohol-serving establishment such as a bar or restaurant may bear partial liability for a drunk driving accident in Texas. Texas dram shop law comes into effect when these types of accidents occur.
What Does Texas Dram Shop Law Say?
Texas dram shop law is part of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. It states that a bar, restaurant, or a similar type of alcohol-serving establishment can be held partially, vicariously liable for a drunken driving wreck resulting in an injury or loss of life if their negligent behavior caused or contributed to the wreck. In other words, Texas dram shop law sees such a negligent alcohol-serving establishment as an entity that was part of a chain of events that led up to a drunken driving accident. Conceivably, without their involvement, no drunk driving accident would have occurred. Violations of Texas dram shop law can occur in two distinct ways: an alcohol-serving establishment over-serves a patron, such that they surpass the .08% legal blood alcohol content level in Texas, or the alcohol-serving establishment allows an intoxicated individual to leave their premises behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.
Texas dram shop law also works to hold a negligent bar or restaurant proportionately accountable for their actions, meaning that an aggrieved party can stand to receive a commensurate amount of compensation based on the percentage of the role that the bar or restaurant is deemed to have played in contributing to a drunk driving accident. For example, if a bar is held to be 20% responsible for an accident and the total amount of damages incurred by a plaintiff is $1,000,000, then the bar would be held accountable for $200,000 of those damages. Texas dram shop law is not meant to hold a bar or restaurant wholly liable for a drunk driving accident. In other words, such a negligent party will always be only partially liable for a drunk driving accident, since the drunk driver also bears liability for the accident. These types of drunk driving laws work to ensure that an alcohol-serving establishment is not negligent in their duties to provide for both their patrons’ safety and for public safety.
How Can a Houston Bar Be Liable for a Drunk Driving Accident?

Some people may be confused or take issue with the fact that Texas dram shop law holds a bar or restaurant accountable for another person’s actions. After all, such an establishment cannot dictate or control what a person does. However, these laws exist since alcohol consumption contributes toward degrading a person’s ability to use reason, which means that a person who is drunk cannot be trusted to know whether or not they’re capable of driving. In these instances, such responsibility is partially passed to the entity responsible for allowing such a person to get to an inebriated state. Texas state law makes it illegal for a person to be in public with a blood alcohol content level over .08%, which means that such drunkenness is a safety risk, both to the person that is drunk as well as to the general public. As such, a bar or restaurant cannot over-serve a person so that they become intoxicated and thus incapable of making reasonable decisions regarding their ability to drive. If such over-serving occurs and an injurious or fatal drunk driving accident occurs, the bar or restaurant would likely be partially liable for the accident.
An example of this type of vicarious liability may be useful to help elucidate the motives behind Texas dram shop law. Imagine that your 17-year-old child drove herself to a dentist to have her wisdom teeth extracted. As part of the dental surgery, she’s given a heavy dose of anaesthesia, but allowed to drive home before the anaesthesia has worn off. In all likelihood, an accident would occur due to her intoxicated state, and the negligent dentist could be held partially liable for allowing the patient to leave while still in an inebriated state. Texas dram shop works to ensure that all liable parties are held proportionately accountable for their negligent behavior in contributing to a Texas drunken driving wreck.
What Are the Responsibilities of Texas Bartenders and Servers?
Texas bars and restaurants that serve alcohol must obtain a liquor license through the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) before being allowed to legally sell and distribute alcoholic beverages. Such licensure requires that the workers, bartenders, and servers at these establishments undergo specific training where they’re informed of their duties in regards to Texas law and the serving of alcohol, as well as how to look out for the warning signs of drunkenness. In other words, a bartender or server cannot plead ignorance in regards to Texas dram shop law as a way of skirting responsibility for their negligent behavior.
Written policies must also be in place at alcohol serving establishments in Texas that work to ensure that servers and bartenders are able to track and monitor a patron’s alcohol consumption, which includes the type and quantity of alcohol consumed. Policies that have proven to be effective have included tally sheets, both written and electronic, hand signals, or color-coded coasters or glasses, which can all be used to measure the amount and type of alcohol consumption that is going on at a bar or restaurant. Unfortunately, even with these types of policies in place, over-serving can still occur, especially if a bartender or server desires a better tip or is urged by their management to increase alcohol sales.
Additionally, written policies must exist that describe what’s to be done when a customer becomes intoxicated. In most instances, a manager will intercede and work to resolve the situation before it escalates into something more than just a night out at a restaurant. Drink consumption will be cut off, and food may be offered. If the inebriated person has brought in their own alcohol, it will be removed from them. Arrangements for transportation via taxi may also be made for the drunk patron by a worker at the bar or restaurant, in which a representative of the bar or restaurant must witness the drunk driven getting into a cab. If such reasonable actions are not taken by an alcohol-serving establishment, then the bar or restaurant could be held partially liable for any accident that a drunk patron may cause after visiting their restaurant.
What Are Signs of Intoxication?
Many people know what the signs of intoxication are: aggressive behavior, drowsiness, slurred speech, unbalanced walking, incoherent thought, etc. Bartenders and servers are trained to be on the lookout for such signs so that they do not over-serve such an individual or allow them to drive off their premises while drunk. However, what is a bartender supposed to do if a person can “hold their drink,” so to speak? There are guidelines that cover this as well, and this is one of the areas in which keeping close tabs on a patron’s tab becomes vitally important toward ensuring compliance with Texas dram shop law. For example, standards exist in which a person should not be served more than two glasses of wine per hour, or 1 shot of liquor or 1 cocktail made from liquor per hour, or more then two 20-ounce servings of beer per hour. Serving alcohol in excess of these standards can often result in a patron exceeding a .08% blood alcohol content level, even if their exterior behavior belies their inebriated state. If such a drunken person later causes a Houston drunken driving accident that results in personal injury or death, a negligent bar or restaurant cannot escape partial liability behind the fact that they simply did not see any apparent signs of intoxication.
How Does Proximate Cause Factor into a Houston Drunk Driving Accident Case?
Proximate cause means that a liable party, i.e. a defendant, was partially responsible for causing or contributing to an accident. In other words, they were part of the chain of events that led up to a plaintiff’s injury or loss. In Texas drunken driving collisions, the drunk driver would be considered the direct cause, while an alcohol-serving establishment, if involved, would be considered a proximate cause. In auto accidents there can often be multiple proximate causes, meaning that a unique case must often be built against each defendant based on their role in the accident. With 20 years of experience in both personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits, Houston drunken driving wreck lawyer Michael Grossman can assist you in seeking fair compensation from all parties involved in your drunk driving accident.
What is the Safe Harbor Defense?
If a drunk driver causes a wreck resulting in injury or death and the driver had been drinking at a bar or restaurant, but the alcohol-serving establishment did everything within reason to prevent the drunk driver from driving drunk, such an establishment can use the safe harbor defense. In other words, the bar or restaurant must be able to prove that they followed all state guidelines and were compliant with Texas dram shop law and the laws governing the sale and distribution of alcohol in the State of Texas. If proven true, the bar or restaurant is then immune to a lawsuit from an aggrieved party.

However, the safe harbor defense can also be employed by alcohol-serving establishments that were negligent in their duties to provide for the public safety and the safety of their patrons. They will attempt to use the safe harbor defense in the hopes that a thorough investigation will not be made into their behavior in regards to a drunk driving accident. In those instances, having the experienced help of a Houston drunk driving accident law firm like Grossman Law Offices can often prove invaluable, since we can conduct an independent investigation into the drunk driving accident in order to ascertain if a bar or restaurant was indeed negligent in their duties, contributing to your injury or loss as a result of a Houston drunk driving wreck. With 20 years of experience in Texas dram shop cases, we’re familiar with the tactic often employed by negligent bars and restaurants, as well as their attorneys. We will seek to uncover all liable parties so that you can stand to be fully compensated by those responsible for your injury or loss.
Contact Houston Dram Shop Attorney Michael Grossman for Help With Your Drunk Driving Accident Case
Drunk driving accidents can be especially devastating because of the amount of damage they can cause. Such accidents far too often result in severe personal injury or even death. An injured victim or a bereaved family could stand to be compensated for their financial losses, such as medical bills, funeral expenses, legal fees, lost wages due to time off from work, as well as their pain and suffering, through a personal injury lawsuit or a wrongful death lawsuit. Furthermore, if a negligent bar, restaurant, or alcohol-serving establishment was involved in the Houston drunk driving wreck that caused you harm or loss, they could also be held partially liable for the accident. In seeking justice through a lawsuit, you’ll not only be seeking compensation for your incurred damages, but you will also be working to ensure that further similar accidents don’t have to occur to another person or family as a result of a negligent bar or restaurant. However, seeking compensation through such a lawsuit that involved Texas dram shop law can be challenging for attorneys with little to no experience in such cases. With two decades of such experience, Houston drunk driving wreck lawyer Michael Grossman is ready to assist you in seeking full and fair compensation from the negligent parties responsible for your injury or loss. Don’t let a past injury or loss result in further financial strain.Contact Grossman Law Offices at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) for a free legal consultation where you can ask questions and get answers regarding your possible legal options in light of a Houston, TX drunk driving accident.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$350,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$140,000.00
$140,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Third Party Dram Shop
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$337,500.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Punctured Colon and Soft Tissue Injuries)
Our client suffered a punctured colon and numerous soft tissue injuries in an alcohol-related car accident. The accident occurred as the defendant driver crashed his car into a concrete median. The plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, alleged that the defendant driver was over served alcohol to such an extent that he was several times the legal limit. As such, a claim was brought against the defendant driver and the bar which over served him. A settlement was reached with the defendant driver and the plaintiff turned his focus on the bar in question. The case was resolved successfully through litigation. Based on the egregious conduct of the bar and it's numerous TABC violations, the defendant's liquor license was revoked soon after the case was resolved.
Our client suffered a punctured colon and numerous soft tissue injuries in an alcohol-related car accident. The accident occurred as the defendant driver crashed his car into a concrete median. The plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, alleged that the defendant driver was over served alcohol to such an extent that he was several times the legal limit. As such, a claim was brought against the defendant driver and the bar which over served him. A settlement was reached with the defendant driver and the plaintiff turned his focus on the bar in question. The case was resolved successfully through litigation. Based on the egregious conduct of the bar and it's numerous TABC violations, the defendant's liquor license was revoked soon after the case was resolved.
Total Recovery:
$337,500.00
$337,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$134,000.00
$134,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$3,750.00
$3,750.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$109,500.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$109,500.00
$109,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$41,000.00
$41,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$30.00
$30.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Arm)
Recovered for client injured in a liquor liability accident.
Recovered for client injured in a liquor liability accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
(policy limits) Our firm was hired to pursue an intoxicated driver who killed an elderly school crossing guard. The fatal accident occurred as the decedent was escorting a woman and her child across the roadway through a crosswalk. The defendant then sped through the school zone, in an intoxicated a state, and struck the decedent who died on the scene.
The family hired our firm to investigate and pursue the defendant under a wrongful death cause of action. Following our investigation and preliminary vehicle inspection, our attorneys issued a Stowers' demand to the defendants. A significant factor in resolving this claim is that merely days before we submitted our demand to the defendant' insurance carrier, we won a large case against the very same insurance carrier, which was one of several such victories secured against the carrier in our firm's history. Our threats of litigation were therefore heeded and the defendants offered policy limits to settle the claim without the need to file suit.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired to pursue an intoxicated driver who killed an elderly school crossing guard. The fatal accident occurred as the decedent was escorting a woman and her child across the roadway through a crosswalk. The defendant then sped through the school zone, in an intoxicated a state, and struck the decedent who died on the scene.
The family hired our firm to investigate and pursue the defendant under a wrongful death cause of action. Following our investigation and preliminary vehicle inspection, our attorneys issued a Stowers' demand to the defendants. A significant factor in resolving this claim is that merely days before we submitted our demand to the defendant' insurance carrier, we won a large case against the very same insurance carrier, which was one of several such victories secured against the carrier in our firm's history. Our threats of litigation were therefore heeded and the defendants offered policy limits to settle the claim without the need to file suit.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00








