I recommend him to family and friends, and the people that I recommend [him to] are all very happy... and I have also found that he is very well respected within the world and the ramifications of the people that I have had to deal with. So, I'm very happy with Mr. Grossman.

-U. Al Amin
Commercial Vehicle Accident

Houston Bus Accident Attorneys

Have you been injured in an accident involving a Houston METRO bus? Houston attorney Michael Grossman knows how to get you what you deserve.

Houston’s METRO bus system consists of 1,211 city buses which transport thousands of riders all across Houston and the surrounding areas every single day.

Do you have a legal question?
Enter your phone number below and let's talk.
--

With so many miles covered by so many buses, a bus accident in the City of Houston, Texas is a fairly common occurrence.

If you or a loved on have been injured in an accident with Houston METRO bus, our Houston bus accident attorneys can help you get all that you are entitled to.


Accidents While on the Bus

It is very common for passengers to become injured while using the METRO bus service. Sometimes, these injuries occur when the bus is involved with a collision with another vehicle.

In the event that you are riding the bus that bus is involved in an accident with another vehicle, your claims process may become quite difficult. The first difficulty you may encounter has to do with the number of people who will be making a claim. If the accident is caused by the other vehicle, there may be dozens of passengers aboard the bus who need to file a personal injury claim against the other driver’s insurance policy. As you can imagine, very few people have an insurance policy of significant enough value to compensate all of the passengers fairly. In such an event, you will need the help of an experienced bus accident attorney to ensure that you are fairly compensated for your injuries. Our attorneys can help you by identifying potential other sources of money from which you can be compensated, and by helping you claim priority for your portion of the responsible driver’s insurance policy.


Injuries Caused by the Bus Itself

Sometimes, the bus itself can pose a safety hazard such as when the bus runs over a passenger or other pedestrian, the bus driver starts driving before a passenger is seated, or when the door or automated stairs make contact with a passenger.

If you have been struck by a bus while standing outside of the bus, your claim would be similar to that of a conventional pedestrian accident victim. The difference however, is that you would be filing a claim against METRO which is effectively an institution owned by the city. As you can imagine, you stand little chance for victory without the help of an experienced attorney when you try to get money from the city, in a Houston city courtroom.

If you have been injured while on the bus, because the bus driver starts moving before you are seated, you will certainly need the help of a lawyer. Such claims are virtually impossible for non-lawyers to win on their own, because the city of Houston has such a long history of denying these types of claims as valid. Hundreds of court cases involving Houston METRO buses have resulted in numerous denials because lawmakers generally operate under the belief that you knowingly assume such a risk by getting on the bus in the first place. Our attorneys can help you with this type of case by employing contrary case law and statutes that counteract this rather nonsensical outlook that seems so prevalent in these types of cases in Houston.

If you have been injured by some component on the METRO bus such as a door in the process of opening or closing, much of the above mentioned applies to your scenario as well. The bottom line is that these cases have little chance of making it past the scrutiny of a Houston court room without the help of an experienced attorney.

Do you have a legal question?
Enter your phone number below and let's talk.
--

Car Accident With METRO Bus

If you have been involved in an accident with a METRO bus while driving an automobile, you will certainly require the help of an experienced Houston bus accident lawyer. Many laws have been put into effect to give buses a considerable amount of right of way. This has led to a general (and unfair) stigma that bus accidents are universally the fault of the other vehicle. That is simply not the case. As unfair as it may be, such biases within the justice system are common, and your only chance for a fair case is to partner with an experienced bus accident attorney.

In addition to the tremendous bias that you may face, you will ultimately be attempting to collect money from a commercial insurance policy. These types of policies are extremely high in value (usually about 50 times more valuable than the typical car insurance policy). This means that you will have to deal with an extremely aggressive insurance adjuster. The adjusters that defend these high value policies have been promoted into such a position because they exhibit a high level of efficiency at denying claims or reducing their value through the use of hardball negotiation techniques. Furthermore, these adjusters are backed by a team of investigators and defense attorneys who are tasked with the sole duty of building a case against you. State law does not clearly spell out the basis by which an insurance company may deny a claim. These subjects you to the insurance company’s own internal protocols which have all been designed by them, to save them the most money. They can, and routinely do, deny claims based on technicalities that exist only within their “rules”.

To put it quite simply, you are playing a game which they wrote the rules for. When facing a team of professionals working against you, you need a team of your own. The aggressive and knowledgeable Houston bus accident attorneys of Grossman Law Offices want to be your team.



Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases

$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.

Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.

Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$82,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$10,000.00
$1,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.

Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.

Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.

Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.

Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.

The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.

Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
Total Recovery:
$1,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0
$875,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Total Recovery:
$875,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$288,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$145,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back and Neck Injury)
Recovery for driver struck from behind by 18-wheeler: Driver sustained back and neck injury.
Total Recovery:
$145,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,696.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$350.00
$102,500.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Both Legs Broken)
Recovery for client who suffered injuries to both legs in a truck accident.
Total Recovery:
$102,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$40,833.00
Litigation Expenses:
$19,984.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Broken Femur)
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.

The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.

Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$187,500.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our firm was hired by a young woman who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler when she slowed for traffic in a construction zone. Initially, she attempted to represent herself and the insurance carrier offered roughly $1,000 to settle her case. She then contacted our firm and we filed suit soon after our initial investigation. The case was successfully resolved in litigation.
Total Recovery:
$187,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$61,875.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$60,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries & Chiropractic Treatment)
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
Total Recovery:
$60,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$20,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,050.00