- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Fire & Burn Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Injured in a Houston Car Accident?
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Cases
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Lifting Injury
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Main Information Page
- Attorney Referrals
- Legal Term Glossary
- Glossary Terms "A"
- Glossary Terms "B"
- Glossary Terms "C"
- Glossary Terms "D"
- Glossary Terms "E"
- Glossary Terms "F"
- Glossary Terms "G"
- Glossary Terms "H"
- Glossary Terms "I"
- Glossary Terms "J"
- Glossary Terms "L"
- Glossary Terms "M"
- Glossary Terms "N"
- Glossary Terms "O"
- Glossary Terms "P"
- Glossary Terms "R"
- Glossary Terms "S"
- Glossary Terms "V"
- Glossary Terms "W"
- Mission Statement
- Recent Cases of Note
- FAQs
- Contact Us
We will definitely be using Grossman Law Offices for all of our future legal matters and I recommend them to anyone who needs a good attorney on their side.
-
P. Hogan
Automobile Accident Case
Texas Statute of Limitations
What is the Texas Statute of Limitations for a Personal Injury Lawsuit in Houston?
Statute of limitations refers to the amount of time that an injured party has in order to take legal action against the liable party or parties responsible for their injury. The statute of limitations varies from state to state, but the Texas statute of limitations for a personal injury case is comparably short.
The Texas statute of limitations for a personal injury case is two years from the date of injury. In other words, if an aggrieved party has not sought legal action within two years after sustaining an injury due to another party’s negligent behavior, they are no longer allowed to seek compensation for their injury from that party.
The two-year statute of limitations in Texas applies to many different types of personal injury cases such as injuries sustained in auto accidents, workplace injuries, product liability injuries, or general personal injuries sustained in any number of other ways. Additionally, the wrongful death statute of limitations in Texas is also set at two years from the date of death. However, there are certain exceptions to the Texas statute of limitations that may allow an aggrieved party additional time to pursue legal action dependent on whether or not certain mitigating circumstances played a role in their injury accident.
Exceptions to the Texas Statute of Limitations for a Personal Injury Lawsuit
The exception to a statute of limitations in Texas most often enacted is when a child is injured. Since the minor cannot make reasonable decisions regarding their legal rights, an extension allows a child until the age of 20 to take legal action themselves against a liable party. Technically, the two-year statute of limitations begins to when the child becomes a legal adult at the age of 18, consequently giving them until the age of 20 to seek legal action on their own accord. If a parent or guardian has not pursued legal action against a negligent party on behalf of the child while the victim is still a child, then the child could pursue legal action themselves once they become an adult. The same type of exception exists in connection to Texas wrongful death lawsuits if a child loses one or both parents due to the negligent behavior of another party.
Furthermore, lack of common knowledge can also be an issue that allows an extension to be granted to the Texas statue of limitations. This means that an injured victim’s statute begins to run when they have become aware of their injury, instead of from the date the injury was first sustained. For example, mesothelioma cases must often employ the lack of common knowledge exception due to the fact that the symptoms of asbestos-exposure can take years to present themselves. As such, an injured victim may not know until many years after sustaining an injury that they have merit in bringing a personal injury lawsuit against the liable parties since their actual injury did not appear until many years later.
Certain extenuating circumstances can also contribute to an extension being granted. For example, if an injured victim is in a coma and is not physically able to seek legal action within the two years following their injury, an extension will likely be granted so that the injured victim has the same legal right to pursue compensation as they would have had they been conscious to do so.
Lastly, a reasonable standard is used to determine whether or not an injured victim has had a fair opportunity to seek legal recourse for their sustained injury. Some extenuating circumstances may exist in which an injured victim was unaware that they could seek legal action, such as many instances of those that suffer from mesothelioma. However, such sufferers of mesothelioma cannot wait for three years after developing noticeable medical symptoms to consider seeking legal action. An extension would likely not be granted in such an instance. Additionally, an injured victim cannot plead ignorance in regards to the Texas statute of limitations in order to seek an exception.
Do Not Wait to Take Legal Action
While two years may sound like a long time, it is actually not such a long time in the legal realm. While you can wait to file a lawsuit after almost two years has passed from the date of your injury, waiting so long can likely do harm to your personal injury claim. The earlier that an injured victim contacts an experienced Houston personal injury lawsuit, the more likely it is that such a victim could stand a greater opportunity at receiving proper compensation for their injury.
Investigating a personal injury accident takes time. Gathering large amounts of relevant evidence is important toward building a strong case that can work to get you the compensation you’re likely in need of receiving. Often, with more time, a more thorough investigation can be made into the accident site. Eyewitnesses can be located so that a thorough understanding of the events of the accident can be achieved. Consequently, the sooner you contact an attorney to assist in investigating your accident, the more likely it will be that an exhaustive investigation can be conducted. With such evidence, mediation may be able to occur in which the personal injury attorney will be able to use the evidence in order to reach an out-of-court settlement with the liable party. In other words, a victim may never have to set foot in a courtroom if a mediated settlement can be reached. However, if a victim waits too long to seek legal action, an attorney may not have the option of seeking mediation simply due to the constraints of time and the Texas statute of limitations.
Furthermore, the opposition in a vast majority of personal injury cases in Texas will likely be preparing for a legal battle before you may have even considered contacting legal help. Since insurers, trucking companies, and employers are often well-prepared to deal with personal injury claims at a moment’s notice, they will likely have legal professionals on-call that can rapidly respond to an accident scene. While you may be hesitating to contact a Houston personal injury lawyer, the opposition may have already investigated the accident site in order to build a strong case against you. Consequently, waiting to take legal action where necessary could create an uphill legal battle against a well-prepared defense attorney.
Don’t Let the Texas Statute of Limitations Prevent You From Seeking Compensation
If you’ve suffered an injury in Houston, it’s important to contact an attorney as soon as possible in order to see if you may have a legitimate personal injury claim against the negligent party. By waiting too long to seek legal action, you may be unintentionally causing harm to your possible case. The Houston personal injury attorneys at Grossman Law Offices offer toll-free legal consultations at 1-855-392-0000 should you have further questions about the Texas statute of limitations, its exceptions, or how the statute of limitations may apply to your particular personal injury accident.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$65,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue injuries in an automobile accident.
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue injuries in an automobile accident.
Total Recovery:
$65,000.00
$65,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$26,000.00
$26,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$70,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Neck & Back Injury)
(policy limits) Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back and neck injuries in a motor-vehicle accident.
(policy limits) Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back and neck injuries in a motor-vehicle accident.
Total Recovery:
$70,000.00
$70,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$23,333.00
$23,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$656.00
$656.00
$109,500.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$109,500.00
$109,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$41,000.00
$41,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$30.00
$30.00
$60,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries & Chiropractic Treatment)
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
Total Recovery:
$60,000.00
$60,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,050.00
$1,050.00
$71,197.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Neck Injury)
(policy limits + UIM claim) Recovery for client who sustained soft tissue injuries to neck which required steroid injections and chiropractic treatment.
(policy limits + UIM claim) Recovery for client who sustained soft tissue injuries to neck which required steroid injections and chiropractic treatment.
Total Recovery:
$71,197.00
$71,197.00
Attorney Fees:
$23,852.00
$23,852.00
Litigation Expenses:
$125.00
$125.00
$40,000.00 Recovery - Medical Malpractice (Sexual Harassment by a Medical Provider)
Recovery for client who was sexually harassed by a medical provider.
Recovery for client who was sexually harassed by a medical provider.
Total Recovery:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$16,000.00
$16,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$575.00
$575.00
$226,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Shoulder Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Total Recovery:
$226,000.00
$226,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$84,000.00
$84,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,500.00
$5,500.00
$93,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries and Abrasions)
Recovered for victim of motorcycle accident who suffered soft tissue injuries and abrasions.
Recovered for victim of motorcycle accident who suffered soft tissue injuries and abrasions.
Total Recovery:
$93,000.00
$93,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$31,000.00
$31,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$181.00
$181.00
$530,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Total Recovery:
$530,000.00
$530,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$210,000.00
$210,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$875,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Total Recovery:
$875,000.00
$875,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$288,750.00
$288,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$2,500.00








