- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Burn and Scald Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- Missouri City Personal Injuries
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Clear Lake Personal Injury Lawyer
- Deer Park Personal Injury Attorney
- Galveston Personal Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena Personal Injury Attorney
- Sugar Land Personal Injury Lawyer
- Texas City Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Deer Park Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Galveston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Pasadena Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Sugar Land Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Trucking Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Houston Fatal Truck Accident Attorney
- Galveston Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Sugar Land Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Conroe Truck Accident Lawyer
- Galveston 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Pasadena Truck Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Clear Lake Truck Accident Lawyer
- Deer Park Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Accident Lawsuits
- Texas City 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Auto Accident Attorney
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Clear Lake Car Accident Lawyer
- Galveston Car Accident Lawyer
- Houston Accident Attorney
- Houston Accident Injury Lawyer
- Houston Car Accident Lawyer
- Pasadena Car Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land Car Accident Lawyer
- Texas City Car Accident Lawyer
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- Houston Drunk Driver Accident Lawyer
- Dram Shop and Liquor Liability Cases in Houston
- Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents
- Galveston Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas Drunk Driver Accident Statistics
- Conroe Drunken Driver Accidents
- Pasadena Drunk Driving Accidents
- Sugar Land Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas City Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Attorney
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Pasadena Work Injury Lawyer
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- Houston Lifting Injury
- More...
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Galveston Work Injury Lawyer
- Sugar Land Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- Houston Trench Collapse Attorney
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
Have You or Has a Loved One Been Involved in an Accident With an 18-Wheeler Truck? Our Houston Lawyers can Help.

As you are well aware, accidents involving 18-wheelers generally cause more severe damage and injures than conventional car accidents.
What you may not be aware of is that there are many important and distinct differences between 18-wheeler accidents and conventional car accidents. The biggest mistake that most accident victims make is trying to approach 18-wheeler accidents the same way as a car accident. In the legal world, the two are very different. Houston 18-wheeler accident attorney Michael Grossman offers the following information so that you can understand why this is often the case, and why the need for experienced legal representation in such personal injury or wrongful death cases as a result of an 18-wheeler accident is often imperative towards being awarded compensation fro your injury or loss.
Who’s to Blame for an 18-wheeler Accident?
One of the first questions that any person who has been hurt in a semi-truck wreck or has lost a loved one in a tractor-trailer collision has is, “Who did it?” It’s human nature to want to know what caused such devastation, and, furthermore, there must be at least one party at fault if legal action is to be sought. 18-wheeler accidents are often different from passenger-vehicle only wrecks from the very outset in that there are likely multiple negligent parties that can be held liable for the accident. The truck driver is a negligent party, but, in Texas, the truck driver’s employer can also be held liable for an accident. Due to the legal notion in Texas law known as “respondeat superior,” an employer is responsible for their employees’ negligent behavior that causes injury or death. The type of liability is known as vicarious liability since the employer itself was not at the scene of the accident when it occurred, but, if proven negligent, somehow contributed to the accident. This could have been done through negligent hiring practices, improper maintenance of their fleet, or poor training of their drivers. Since trucking companies in Texas must carry insurance, an insurance company will also then become involved in the process of seeking compensation for your pain or loss, which brings with it a whole host of challenges that will be discussed later.
Other liable parties could include a third-party cargo-loading company. If they can be proven to have been negligent in their duties and shifting cargo led to a rollover or other type of 18-wheeler accident, the cargo-loading company could be held partially liable for the accident. If defective brakes failed on a tractor-trailer, the manufacturer could be held liable. If the truck hit an overpass as a result of following a pre-planned route as planned by an outside route-planning company, that company could be held partially liable. If another vehicle struck a semi-truck, causing the semi-truck to hit your car, the other driver and their insurer could be held liable. If the driver of an 18-wheeler was drunk at the time of the accident, Texas dram shop law allows for the bar or restaurant that served that driver or allowed that driver to leave their premises to be held liable for their actions contributing to the drunk driving 18-wheeler accident.

18-wheeler accidents can have many possible liable parties, and an experienced Houston 18-wheeler accident attorney will make sure to conduct a thorough investigation into the accident so that all liable parties are found and held accountable for their negligent actions. Furthermore, an 18-wheeler accident lawyer must also be able to build unique cases against each individual defendant based on their role in the accident. Depending on the particular circumstances of the case and the number of defendants, this can prove to be quite challenging quite quickly. However, Michal Grossman of Grossman Law Offices has twenty years of experience in 18-wheeler accident cases. His knowledge and experience can assist you in seeking compensation for your injury or loss, even in the face of multiple defendants or a complex accident scene.
Why is Seeking Compensation in an 18-wheeler Accident Case Challenging?
Often, the number one reason seeking compensation in an 18-wheeler accident case is challenging is a result of the high-dollar value of the insurance policy likely at stake. 18-wheelers are usually covered by large commercial insurance policies which are generally about 50 times more valuable than that of a normal passenger car. As a result, the insurance company simply does not want to lose what could amount to millions of dollars. In order to ensure that the least amount of compensation is paid out, they will use their most experienced insurance adjusters and a team of rapid-response defense attorney to defend their interests, i.e. their bottom-line. Regardless of your actual need for compensation, they will, in all likelihood, work to see the claim denied or severely lessened.
Highly Experienced Insurance Adjusters
The insurance adjusters who are assigned to commercial vehicle policies are the most aggressive insurance adjusters in the business. Effectively, these adjusters have been in the industry for many years and were promoted to such a valuable position because of their proven abilities to ruthlessly deny claims just like yours. They will employ certain tactics in order to cast as much blame as possible on the victim for causing the accident. With every incremental amount of blame that can be put onto the victim’s shoulders, they are responsible for paying that much less in compensation. Their ultimate goal is to have the claim denied. Since Houston 18-wheeler accident attorney Michael Grossman has brought cases against every major insurer, we’re wise to their ways and will be able to assist you in dealing with their aggressive tactics.
Furthermore, 18-wheelers are subjected to federal regulations as set forth by the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration. This creates complex areas of overlap between federal and state laws. Insurance adjusters routinely take advantage of these technicalities and will chose to base their decisions on state law or federal law depending on which happens to be more convenient for them. These adjusters routinely deny claims or assign an unfair portion of blame based on technicalities that you have probably never even heard of.
Ready to Respond Defense Attorneys
Commercial insurance carriers who insure 18-wheelers have their own team of defense attorneys on standby at all times. As soon as an 18-wheeler accident occurs these attorneys are dispatched with the sole duty of building a case against you. Their job is to find any legal recourse they can use to protect their insurance policy. They will aggressively seek out anything they can use to place any amount of fault on you and will work with anything they can use in order to diminish the amount of your compensation package.
The insurance companies that represent 18-wheeler drivers usually have an in house team of investigators and accident recreation experts that are available around the clock. In many of the 18-wheeler cases our firm has worked, this team of investigators arrives at the scene before the victim even leaves in an ambulance. This is just another example of the extreme measures that the commercial insurance carrier takes to quickly build a case against you. Additionally, in normal car accidents, it is routine for the accident victim to exchange information with the defendant and both parties leave the scene (often by tow truck or ambulance). This is not the case in an 18-wheeler accident. In just about every Houston 18-wheeler accident injury case our firm has worked, the 18-wheeler driver was required to stay at the scene of the accident and await the team of investigators and defense attorneys.

By the time you have had a chance to read this information, the 18-wheeler’s insurance carrier has already assigned an aggressive adjuster, dispatched an investigative team, and has sent an attorney to the scene with the purpose of building a case against you. In so doing, they’re attempting to build a stout case against you so that they will not have to pay out a sizable sum. By enlisting the help of Houston 18-wheeler accident lawyer and his experienced investigative team at Grossman Law Offices, you will also have a team on your side, working with your best interests in mind, that can also respond to a scene quickly, make a thorough investigation, and work to build a stout case for you.
Deceptive 18-wheeler Drivers
Most 18-wheeler drivers stake their entire livelihoods on their ability to earn an income driving a truck. As you can imagine, this creates a scenario where there is a lot of pressure on them to do anything they have to protect that livelihood including lying about the events of an accident. Insurance adjusters routinely deny claims based solely on the statement of their insured driver. When such incidents have occurred in past cases that we’ve had, we often have two weapons, so to speak, that we utilize to great effectiveness. Our accident lawyers are often capable of conducting tactful depositions in which the truck driver’s veracity can be found out. Furthermore, our investigative prowess often leads to physical evidence of witness testimony being found that refutes the truck driver’s lies. Additionally, since we’ve been involved in many 18-wheeler accident cases over the last 20 years, we’re familiar with the many ways in which some truck drivers may lie about their involvement in a semi wreck.
Unethical Practices of Some Self-Insured Trucking Companies
As another example of the types of unethical behavior that can occur in some 18-wheeler accidents, there are some trucking companies that choose to insure themselves by setting aside a portion of their income in the event that a claim is brought against them. However, since these types of trucking companies do not have to hold themselves to the same standards and regulations that normal insurers have to maintain, these types of companies often believe that they can get away with certain unethical behaviors. Such behaviors include evidence deletion or tampering, witness badgering, and plaintiff threatening. Our law offices have been called on numerous occasions by a victim who has been treated poorly by a self-insured trucking company. Once called, we intervene and pursue legal actions that will compel the negligent company to begin acting rightly so that the victim has a level playing field so that they can seek compensation for their injury or loss. By contacting Houston 18-wheeler accident attorney Michael Grossman before attempting to deal with such a trucking company, you can likely save yourself from suffering through a fruitless and frustrating experience.
Why Can’t I Just Pursue Legal Action on My Own?
In our twenty years of litigating 18-wheeler accident cases in Texas, we’ve never seen a self-represented plaintiff succeed in getting compensation for their injury or loss as a result of an 18-wheeler collision. The defense is often too stout, the defendants are often too many, and the laws are often too complex for a non-attorney to have any reasonable opportunity to see a personal injury or wrongful death claim result in a successful conclusion. Even if a self-represented plaintiff has a full understanding of the laws surrounding their case (which is quite unlikely), knowing how to apply those laws and how to follow proper procedure in court is just as important as knowing the law. Furthermore, a lawyer builds a reputation with every case they take, and that reputation can also prove to be a vital part of a successful personal injury or wrongful death case. With 20 years of litigating experience, our reputation often precedes us, even to the point where many insurers will offer our clients out-of-court settlements instead of opting to meet our attorneys at trial.
Have an Independent Investigation Performed As Soon as Possible
If you’ve been injured or have lost a loved one to an 18-wheeler accident, it’s important that you contact experienced legal help as soon as possible in the aftermath of the accident so that an independent investigation can be performed. When Grossman Law Offices takes an 18-wheeler accident case, we will visit the scene of the accident when necessary and perform a thorough investigation so that all liable parties can be brought to justice. Furthermore, we will be careful to conduct the investigation such that all evidence gathered will be permissible in a court of law. By contacting us quickly, you are often working towards your own best interests since strong cases can often be built in the immediate aftermath of a wreck. If you decide to wait for even a few days, evidence could go missing and witnesses might not be able to be found. Furthermore, trucking companies can even legally delete their trucks’ safety records after a certain time period has passed, so it’s often even more important in 18-wheeler accident cases that an investigation is done soon after the wreck has occurred.
Houston 18-wheeler Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help You Today
Did You Know?

Our Houston 18 wheeler accident attorneys have won thousands of cases. Call us today to discuss your case. 1-855-392-0000
It should be apparent that the level of aggression and legal opposition that you will face following your 18-wheeler accident will overshadow any dealings you may have ever had with an insurance company. Without the help of an experienced 18 wheeler accident attorney in Houston, Texas, you are at a clear disadvantage. With so much at stake you cannot afford to oppose a team of professional investigators, experienced adjusters, the eyewitness account of the truck driver, and a team of defense attorneys, without having an experienced and capable team of your own. Our Houston 18-wheeler accident attorneys would like to be that team. For 20 years, our aggressive and knowledgeable attorneys at Grossman Law Offices have made trucking companies and their commercial insurance carriers pay for the pain they have caused our clients. Contact us today for a free consultation at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) to discuss the details of your 18-wheeler accident case and get answers to your pressing questions. We’re here to help you get through the legal process so that you can stand to receive compensation for your injury or loss as a result of an 18-wheeler accident.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$475,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Motorcycle Accident (Shoulder Injury Requiring Surgery)
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
Total Recovery:
$475,000.00
$475,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$158,333.00
$158,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Back Injuries)
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$200,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Total Recovery:
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$80,000.00
$80,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,709.00
$5,709.00
$2,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
The family of a deceased woman hired our firm following a fatal 18-wheeler accident. The fatal accident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered out of his lane, resulting in a massive collision. The decedent, a passenger in a vehicle, died on the scene.
Her adult children consulted our firm to initially investigate the accident and make sense of the facts and circumstances since the family felt that the police report did not make it clear enough precisely what occurred. We launched a full investigation an immediately deposed the investigating officers.
Upon the completion of our investigation, it was apparent that the trucking company was indeed negligent and a lawsuit was soon filed. The defendant's launched an aggressive defense whereby they initially claimed that the truck driver was overcome by his passenger who allegedly grabbed the steering wheel and deliberately drove the truck off the road, despite the truck driver's best efforts.
We refuted this claim by illustrating that the tire marks that were present clearly show the truck gradually moving across the road and eventually onto the grass, which is entirely inconsistent with an abrupt lane change caused by someone taking control of the wheel. It was quite an unusual defense strategy that we were frankly surprised to even find ourselves having to refute.
The defendants then argued that a tire blowout may have contributed to the accident, which is significant because it would enable the defendant to offset some portion of their liability to a tire manufacturer or installer. Through deposition testimony of the investigating officer we established that there was absolutely no indication at the scene of the accident that a tire had blown out.
Finally, the defendants argued that the company which loaded the trailer may have improperly loaded the cargo. This argument was most plausible considering that the precise cause of the decedent's death was that she was essentially pummeled by cargo that broke through trailer and struck her person.
Our firm consulted several experts in the fields of heavy cargo transportation and physics. Our experts felt that the cargo was secured in a manner that is perfectly consistent with industry standards and that due to the forces involved, the cargo would not have behaved any differently irrespective of how it was secured. In short, the collision caused the cargo to break free and the negligence lay squarely on the trucking company and not any other entity. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
The family of a deceased woman hired our firm following a fatal 18-wheeler accident. The fatal accident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered out of his lane, resulting in a massive collision. The decedent, a passenger in a vehicle, died on the scene.
Her adult children consulted our firm to initially investigate the accident and make sense of the facts and circumstances since the family felt that the police report did not make it clear enough precisely what occurred. We launched a full investigation an immediately deposed the investigating officers.
Upon the completion of our investigation, it was apparent that the trucking company was indeed negligent and a lawsuit was soon filed. The defendant's launched an aggressive defense whereby they initially claimed that the truck driver was overcome by his passenger who allegedly grabbed the steering wheel and deliberately drove the truck off the road, despite the truck driver's best efforts.
We refuted this claim by illustrating that the tire marks that were present clearly show the truck gradually moving across the road and eventually onto the grass, which is entirely inconsistent with an abrupt lane change caused by someone taking control of the wheel. It was quite an unusual defense strategy that we were frankly surprised to even find ourselves having to refute.
The defendants then argued that a tire blowout may have contributed to the accident, which is significant because it would enable the defendant to offset some portion of their liability to a tire manufacturer or installer. Through deposition testimony of the investigating officer we established that there was absolutely no indication at the scene of the accident that a tire had blown out.
Finally, the defendants argued that the company which loaded the trailer may have improperly loaded the cargo. This argument was most plausible considering that the precise cause of the decedent's death was that she was essentially pummeled by cargo that broke through trailer and struck her person.
Our firm consulted several experts in the fields of heavy cargo transportation and physics. Our experts felt that the cargo was secured in a manner that is perfectly consistent with industry standards and that due to the forces involved, the cargo would not have behaved any differently irrespective of how it was secured. In short, the collision caused the cargo to break free and the negligence lay squarely on the trucking company and not any other entity. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$2,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$187,500.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our firm was hired by a young woman who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler when she slowed for traffic in a construction zone. Initially, she attempted to represent herself and the insurance carrier offered roughly $1,000 to settle her case. She then contacted our firm and we filed suit soon after our initial investigation. The case was successfully resolved in litigation.
Our firm was hired by a young woman who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler when she slowed for traffic in a construction zone. Initially, she attempted to represent herself and the insurance carrier offered roughly $1,000 to settle her case. She then contacted our firm and we filed suit soon after our initial investigation. The case was successfully resolved in litigation.
Total Recovery:
$187,500.00
$187,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$61,875.00
$61,875.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$370.00
$210,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Neck Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our client was injured in a motor vehicle accident when an employer driving a company vehicle failed to yield the right of way and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant's employer was sued for negligence soon thereafter. The defendants alleged that the company should not be held liable for the actions of the employee.
They claimed that the employee was not in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident. Through discovery, our attorneys learned that the defendants had a policy, both written and implied, whereby employees of the company were allowed to drive work vehicles after hours.
Furthermore, our attorneys argued case law that expanded the definition of course and scope which showed that the defendant was indeed "on the clock" when the accident occurred.
As a result, the defendants conceded liability and turned their defenses toward the alleged damages. They claimed that our client had a preexisting condition that was responsible for her current state.
We deposed the emergency room physician who assessed the client and recommended surgery regarding the medical necessity of the surgical procedure and the proximate cause of the plaintiff's condition. He testimony unequivocally defeated these arguments. The case was satisfactorily resolved through litigation.
Our client was injured in a motor vehicle accident when an employer driving a company vehicle failed to yield the right of way and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant's employer was sued for negligence soon thereafter. The defendants alleged that the company should not be held liable for the actions of the employee.
They claimed that the employee was not in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident. Through discovery, our attorneys learned that the defendants had a policy, both written and implied, whereby employees of the company were allowed to drive work vehicles after hours.
Furthermore, our attorneys argued case law that expanded the definition of course and scope which showed that the defendant was indeed "on the clock" when the accident occurred.
As a result, the defendants conceded liability and turned their defenses toward the alleged damages. They claimed that our client had a preexisting condition that was responsible for her current state.
We deposed the emergency room physician who assessed the client and recommended surgery regarding the medical necessity of the surgical procedure and the proximate cause of the plaintiff's condition. He testimony unequivocally defeated these arguments. The case was satisfactorily resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$210,000.00
$210,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$70,110.00
$70,110.00
Litigation Expenses:
$3,787.00
$3,787.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Broken Femur)
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$530,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Plaintiff, a delivery driver, suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when he was injured in an accident involving falling cargo from an 18-wheeler. The defendants cited the plaintiff's failure to take evasive action as a source of contributory negligence and litigation commenced accordingly which culminated in an acceptance of liability and eventually satisfactory resolution.
Total Recovery:
$530,000.00
$530,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$210,000.00
$210,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00








