- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Fire & Burn Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Injured in a Houston Car Accident?
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Cases
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Lifting Injury
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Main Information Page
- Attorney Referrals
- Legal Term Glossary
- Glossary Terms "A"
- Glossary Terms "B"
- Glossary Terms "C"
- Glossary Terms "D"
- Glossary Terms "E"
- Glossary Terms "F"
- Glossary Terms "G"
- Glossary Terms "H"
- Glossary Terms "I"
- Glossary Terms "J"
- Glossary Terms "L"
- Glossary Terms "M"
- Glossary Terms "N"
- Glossary Terms "O"
- Glossary Terms "P"
- Glossary Terms "R"
- Glossary Terms "S"
- Glossary Terms "V"
- Glossary Terms "W"
- Mission Statement
- Recent Cases of Note
- FAQs
- Contact Us
After my son was killed in an automobile accident, I contacted Michael Grossman's law office. Mike came down and met with me and assured me he could represent my son and be his voice for justice. These great attorneys took care of all the legal representation and did a phenomenal job.
-
C. Mossier
Mother of a Wrongful Death Victim
Houston Big Rig Accident Attorney
Our aggressive and experienced Houston big rig accident attorneys can help you receive all that you are entitled to, following a Houston truck accident.
Most people are aware that an accident with a big rig will usually result in greater property damage and more severe injuries.
What is not so commonly known is that, with regard to the legal process, big rig accidents are substantially different. Approaching a big rig accident claim or case the same way as you would approach a car accident case will likely end in failure. The tactics used by the insurance company, and the methods for proving up the case are strikingly different. Without proper legal help that has prior experience in litigating big rig accident cases, you will likely stand to receive little to no compensation as a result of your personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. However, Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman has 20 years of such experience and can put that hard-earned, practical knowledge to work for you.
How is a Big Rig Accident Different From a Normal Car Wreck?
While no accidents are normal, passenger-vehicle only accidents occur quite frequently and they often only involve property damage. As a result, there are certain guidelines in place that can help the victim receive compensation from the liable party’s insurer. If you’ve ever been in a fender-bender, you’re likely familiar with the process. For the most part, the process of seeking compensation for your loss in regards to the property damage to your car was fairly straightforward. While dealing with the insurance company may have been mildly irritating, you were likely fairly compensated for your car or your car was fixed. However, big rig accidents are quite different in regards to the way in which a victim must seek compensation. In order to receive full and fair compensation for your injury or loss, you must likely pursue legal action in the form of a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit against all negligent parties.
There Are Likely Multiple Liable Parties
Furthermore, “normal” car accidents often involve only one liable party. Big rig accidents often involve a host of liable parties, many of whom aren’t even at the scene of the accident. Due to their somewhat hidden nature, these types of liable parties can often be challenging to find out unless an experienced Houston big rig accident attorney, like Michael Grossman, is working the accident case. The vicariously liable parties can include any or all of the following:
- An outside company that loads cargo onto the big rig
- An outside route-planning company
- A defective part maker
- An alcohol-serving establishment if the driver was drunk
- Another party, such as another vehicle, that caused the big rig to have a wreck
- The big rig driver’s employer
- The insurer of the employer
In Texas, one of the first additional defendants in any big rig accident case is the truck driver’s employer. This is so because of the legal notion in Texas law known as “respondeat superior” in which an employer is responsible for the negligent actions of their employees. When the employer is a defendant, this often means that the employer’s insurer will also play a role in seeking compensation for your pain or loss. The involvement of this particular entity often raises the stakes of the case and can prove to make such cases quite daunting if a victim has inexperienced legal help.
Expensive Big Rig Insurance Policies
Big rigs are usually covered by large commercial insurance policies that are typically about 50 times more valuable than a regular car accident policy. With so much money on the line, big rig insurance carriers are incredibly aggressive in their defense in order so that they will have to pay out as little as possible. They will seek to skirt as much liability as possible by working to make the victim out to be the liable party. If an insurance adjuster or defense attorney can pin any amount of liability onto the plaintiff, then the amount of compensation awarded could be severely lessened. If a majority of blame can be placed on the plaintiff, then the claim could be denied or the case dismissed.
Veteran Insurance Adjusters
When you are involved in a big rig accident, you will have to deal with an insurance adjuster. These adjusters are not like your typical car accident insurance adjuster. Commercial insurance policy adjusters are the most aggressive and likely most experienced of adjusters in the industry. They have risen to their ranks as a result of being able to see large-sum claims denied or severely lessened. They are professionals in the largest sense of the word in that they will work with their company’s best interests in mind, regardless of your need for compensation. However, Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman has brought cases against every major insurer in the country. That means that we have the knowledge and experience to be able to work against these experienced insurance adjusters with your best interests in mind so that you can stand the greatest likelihood to receive compensation for your pain or loss.
Big rigs operate under the rules set forth by the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration. Additionally, big rigs must also abide by state and local statutes. While that may sound like there are more laws working in your favor, in fact, these laws tend to create an opportunity for insurance companies to create confusion regarding your claim. When dealing with such complex laws, it is tricky for non-attorneys to determine whether or not what they are being told is the truth. Ultimately, the confusion created by these areas of overlap often results in an insurance company denying a claim on a technicality that is likely not well known.
Quickly Responding Defense Attorneys and Investigative Teams
Commercial insurance carriers utilize an in-house investigative team which they dispatch to the scene of an accident immediately after they are notified of the accident. These investigators are charged with the task of recreating the events prior to the accident. They are determined to discover anything they can use to put some portion of the fault on you. In the vast majority of big rig accident cases that our firm has been involved in, we have discovered that these investigators usually arrive on the scene before the victim even leaves the accident site. By the time you have had a chance to read this information, a case may have been started against you as part of an investigation by the insurance carrier’s investigative team to be forwarded to their attorneys and insurance adjusters for the sole purpose of denying your claim. By enlisting the help of Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman, you will also have the legal assistance of an investigative team that can also respond quickly to the scene of an accident in order to build a strong case in your behalf.
Some Truck Drivers May Not Admit Liability
A big rig driver’s entire livelihood rests on their ability to continue driving. They simply can’t afford to accept liability in many cases, and, as a result, will knowingly lie about their liability in order to save their jobs. When no witnesses or scant evidence is involved, some truck drivers can get away with this. However, with our 20 years of litigation experience in big rig accident cases, we’re often able to assess the validity of a truck driver’s testimony. Through careful depositions or thorough investigations, Grossman Law Offices is often able to figure out the truth of an accident, regardless of the claims that a lying truck driver may be making. While it’s somewhat understandable that a truck driver wouldn’t want to lose their job, it cannot be allowed to happen, especially when their negligence caused injury or loss of life. Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman will work to ensure that these types of drivers don’t get off lightly.
Some Big Rig Companies May Be Self-Insured
All Texas trucking companies must insure their drivers and vehicles, but they are not required to use an insurance company. Some big rig companies opt to self-insure, but this can sometimes lead to the unethical treatment of a plaintiff when a claim is brought against such a company. This unethical behavior can take the form of plaintiff threatening, evidence tampering, or witness badgering. Such companies believe they can get away with such behavior out of ignorance or arrogance. Either they don’t know that it’s wrong, or they don’t care that it is. In either instance, their actions create an unfair advantage in which an injured or bereaved victim stands little to no chance of receiving fair compensation. In many ways these types of self-insured trucking companies are essentially trying to bully a plaintiff into getting too frustrated with the process to continue seeking compensation.
Grossman Law Offices has been called many times in the past to work with a victim of such unethical treatment. In those instances, we have pursued legal action to compel the negligent party to act justly so that the injured or bereaved victim can stand a fair chance at receiving their due compensation. Many people could have saved themselves from quite a frustrating experience by contacting Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman before having to deal with such a company. However, if you’re currently in the middle of such a debacle, we can likely still help you and will work towards ensuring a level playing field.
Why Do I Need Legal Representation?
Big rig accident scenes can become quite complex quite quickly. With the addition of multiple defendants, high-dollar insurance policies, experienced insurance adjusters, and rapid-response defense attorneys, an inexperienced attorney likely stands little to no chance of receiving fair compensation for their client in the face of so many seeming obstacles. A non-attorney would face a similar fate. There are simply too many variables involved and the stakes are too high such that a person without the proper experience and knowledge would stand a remote chance of a successful outcome. Furthermore, an attorney spends years in school to learn the law and years in court to learn how to apply the law. Simply knowing what the laws are surrounding a particular accident isn’t enough; an attorney must know both how to apply those laws and how to follow proper procedures in court so that the case isn’t thrown out on a technicality. Furthermore, an experienced attorney builds a certain reputation during their time in and out of court. Houston big rig accident attorney Michael Grossman has such a reputation for the success of his clients that insurance adjusters and defense attorneys will often settle with our clients out of court instead of meeting our lawyers in trial. In other words, our knowledge, experience, and reputation can be a powerful ally in your personal injury or wrongful death claim.
What Should I Do Now?
Often, one of the single best things you can do for your personal injury or wrongful death case is to have an independent investigation performed as soon as possible after the accident has occurred. In so doing you can ensure that vital evidence isn’t lost and that witnesses are tracked down. Furthermore, big rig trucking companies are legally allowed to delete their trucks’ safety records after a certain time period has passed, so waiting too long to pursue legal action could cause those important records to become unavailable for your case. Furthermore, with the likelihood that a case has already begun being built against you, seeking your own legal help that can perform a competent and thorough investigation into your big rig accident is often the first and best step you can take towards securing compensation.
Houston Big Rig Accident Attorney Michael Grossman is Here to Help
When facing such an orchestrated effort against you, it becomes quite obvious that you need a team of your own working to make sure that you are not the victim of an insurance company’s greed or an aggressive attorney’s tactics. Our experienced big rig trucking accident attorneys in Houston would like to be that team. In the past 20 years, our aggressive litigators have defended the rights of Houston big rig accident victims to ensure that they are not taken advantage of by the commercial insurance companies. Contact us today at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) for a free consultation in which you can share the details of your accident case and ask any lingering questions you may have. If there is a case, we can come alongside you so that our knowledge, experience, and reputation can be put to work for you so that you stand the greatest likelihood of receiving full and fair compensation for your injury or loss as a result of a big rig accident.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$60,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries & Chiropractic Treatment)
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
Recovered for client who was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler resulting in soft tissue injuries and chiropractic treatment.
Total Recovery:
$60,000.00
$60,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,050.00
$1,050.00
$90,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries and Leg Contusions)
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back injuries and leg contusions in an 18-wheeler accident.
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back injuries and leg contusions in an 18-wheeler accident.
Total Recovery:
$90,000.00
$90,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$562.00
$562.00
$200,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Total Recovery:
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$80,000.00
$80,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,709.00
$5,709.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Back Injuries)
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$1,450,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Brain Injury)
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Total Recovery:
$1,450,000.00
$1,450,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$560,000.00
$560,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$31,410.00
$31,410.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$82,500.00
$82,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$145,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back and Neck Injury)
Recovery for driver struck from behind by 18-wheeler: Driver sustained back and neck injury.
Recovery for driver struck from behind by 18-wheeler: Driver sustained back and neck injury.
Total Recovery:
$145,000.00
$145,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,333.00
$48,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,696.00
$2,696.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired by the wife and children of a retired Army Colonel who was killed in an underide 18-wheeler accident. In addition to being a decorated veteran, the decedent worked both professionally and on a voluntary basis to establish numerous learning institutions and vocational programs for at risk youths. The accident occurred as the decedent was traveling on a rural highway when an 18-wheeler failed to yield the right of way and made a rolling stop through a stop sign.
This placed the trailer of the 18-wheeler in a position whereby it blocked the entire roadway and shoulder, leaving the decedent no option but to collide with the trailer. Witnesses on the scene attempted to revive him but to no avail. Furthermore, while two female eye witnesses struggled to pry open the decedent's door to provide emergency care, the truck driver stayed in his truck and offered no assistance. Despite what appeared to be an incredibly apparent case of negligence on behalf of the defendant, defense counsel refused to accept liability resulting in rather lengthy litigation.
The defendants initially denied the claim based on the allegation that the decedent was speeding and the truck driver therefore could not adequately gauge the amount of time he had to pause at the stop sign. The physical evidence contradicted this notion entirely, notwithstanding the fact that even if the decedent had been contributorily negligent, that would not have outweighed the severe degree of negligence on the part of the defendant. Nevertheless, our attorneys were able to conclusively refute this argument based on eye-witness testimony and the testimony from police investigators who calculated the decedent's speed to be precisely at the posted speed limit. In a desperate and largely unprecedented move, the defendants then designated the state as a responsible third party.
Generally speaking, a defendant will often threaten to designate a third party in order to leverage their position but it is rare that such an arbitrary and arguably frivolous designation is actually carried out. However, that is precisely what occurred and the state was thusly incorporated into the lawsuit by the defendants. The basis of the defendant's argument was that the state erected a large street sign that obstructed the truck driver's view of approaching traffic.
Several months of intense litigation were required to before the defendant finally acquiesced in regard to this argument. The argument was finally abandoned by the defendants when in the first mediation our attorneys presented video footage shot (in a controlled setting) from the perspective of an 18-wheeler driver which showed that the sign simply did not obstruct enough of the roadway in order to be a hazard. The case was ultimately resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$335,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$335,000.00
$335,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$134,000.00
$134,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$63,000.00
$63,000.00









