- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Fire & Burn Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Injured in a Houston Car Accident?
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Cases
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Lifting Injury
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Main Information Page
- Attorney Referrals
- Legal Term Glossary
- Glossary Terms "A"
- Glossary Terms "B"
- Glossary Terms "C"
- Glossary Terms "D"
- Glossary Terms "E"
- Glossary Terms "F"
- Glossary Terms "G"
- Glossary Terms "H"
- Glossary Terms "I"
- Glossary Terms "J"
- Glossary Terms "L"
- Glossary Terms "M"
- Glossary Terms "N"
- Glossary Terms "O"
- Glossary Terms "P"
- Glossary Terms "R"
- Glossary Terms "S"
- Glossary Terms "V"
- Glossary Terms "W"
- Mission Statement
- Recent Cases of Note
- FAQs
- Contact Us
I was working on a job site and I fell 40 feet and I broke some bones... I was deciding whether I wanted to sue or not, and when my boss didn't pick up the tab, I decided to call an attorney. I called Mike and he got me my check. He's very firm in his decision making. He handles his business. Dealing with this law firm has made me pretty happy. I'm glad that I chose Mike Grossman. If I hadn't decided to sue and went with Mike, I probably wouldn't have gotten anything. 
-
T. Young
Workplace Accident Case
Houston Loading Dock Injury Lawyer
Have You Experienced an Injury in a Houston Loading Dock? Houston Workplace Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help You Seek Compensation
Loading dock injuries are a common occurrence at work sites in Texas and around the country. These types of workplace accidents can cause serious to severe injury, or even death.
If you’ve been injured as a result of a loading dock injury in Houston, you may be able to seek compensation for your injury through a workers' compensation claim or a personal injury lawsuit. Houston work injury attorney Michael Grossman, with 20 years of experience in personal injury law in connection to work-related injuries in Texas, can assist you in seeking full and fair compensation so that you can get back on your feet, and, where possible, back to working. The following article lists common types of loading dock injuries in Texas, and details the legal ramifications of seeking compensation for such an injury.
Common Types of Loading Dock Injuries
Any type of work-related accident that occurs on a loading dock and results in an injury to a victim due to a liable party’s negligence is grounds for a loading dock accident personal injury lawsuit in Texas. These types of accidents can happen in a wide variety of ways, resulting in a wide variety of injuries. Heavy-lifting injuries are a common result of loading dock accidents due to the strain that is put on the back from repeated lifting of heavy objects. Even one instance of lifting an object that is too heavy for one person to handle can result in serious injury. If proper safety equipment was not provided to assist in heavy-lifting duties, or if another co-worker was negligent in helping you to lift a heavy object, then a personal injury lawsuit may be merited.
Another common cause of loading dock injuries in Texas occurs when a delivery truck, 18-wheeler, or other type of commercial vehicle hits a loading dock worker. Since loading docks can sometimes be raucous, loud places with a lot of activity going on, these types of accidents are fairly common. However, drivers who exhibit such negligence while on a loading dock can still be held accountable for their negligent driving. Employers that do not adequately provide for their employees’ safety while on a loading dock may also be held liable for a truck wreck on a loading dock. Our Houston personal injury law firm has worked many cases in the past similar to these loading dock truck accidents, so we’re familiar with the intricacies of the law often involved in such technical matters. In other words, we have a full understanding of work-injury law in Texas, as well as a robust grasp of the laws surrounding commercial trucking accidents.
In a similar vein, forklift accidents on loading docks are another common cause of workplace injuries. If a co-worker is inexperienced or has received less than adequate training to operate a forklift, they may cause a severe loading dock accident. As such, both the co-worker and the employer may bear liability for such an accident, depending on the details of the accident itself. Our personal injury law firm in Houston has also represented plaintiffs in many pallet jack accident and forklift wreck cases. In the tragic instances where a worker has lost their life due to the negligence of a forklift operator, we’ve represented the family that has lost a loved one. In such work-related wrongful death cases, we help the family toward compensation for their loss while simultaneously working to ensure that a similar fatal accident does not have to befall another family in the future.
Lastly, loading dock injuries can also be caused by rather uncommon accidents, such as falling boxes or debris, or exposure to hazardous materials while on the loading dock. When these types of loading dock accidents occur, it can sometime be challenging to identify the liable parties. In many instances, liability for a loading dock accident may be placed with more than one party. When this occurs, a different case must be built against each unique defendant, so having the legal help of an experienced Houston work-injury attorney like Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices can prove beneficial toward such cases being staked against the negligent parties.
Loading Dock Injuries Can Often Result in Traumatic Brain Injury
While loading dock injuries can run the gamut from soft tissue injuries to broken bones to herniated discs to more egregious injuries like severe lacerations or the loss of limbs, traumatic brain injury is a commonly occurring result of loading dock injuries, due to the vulnerability of a worker’s head, especially when forklifts are being used, or when proper safety equipment is not being utilized. Properly assessing a traumatic brain injury in the aftermath of a loading dock injury is vital toward seeking adequate compensation to cover the victim’s full extent of his or her injury. Since a traumatic brain injury may not fully present itself for days or weeks, an experienced attorney must seek the knowledge of competent medical professionals in order to help prove up damages, i.e. justify the amount of compensation being sought for the worker’s traumatic brain injury as a result of a loading dock accident. Long term damage may result in the victim not being able to return to work, and that is one of the items that must be factored into the amount of compensation requested from the defendant. With two decades of experience in proving up damages and working with medical professionals to ensure that our clients’ injuries are fully assessed, Houston work-injury attorney Michael Grossman has the necessary tools to help ensure that you and your family can stand to seek full compensation for your injury, including loading dock injuries that may result in a traumatic brain injury.
Workers Compensation Insurance and Houston Loading Dock Injuries
Unlike most states in America, Texas does not require its employers to carry workers compensation insurance. However, a majority of employers in Texas are covered by workers compensation insurance due to the protections it affords them. Namely, they choose to be subscribers to workers comp because it means that they’re immune to lawsuits brought against them by an injured victim or a bereaved family. (However, the one exception to such immunity is if an employer’s gross negligence contributed to an employee’s death). Employers that are not covered by workers compensation insurance, a.k.a non-subscribers, can be sued through a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. As such, assessing whether or not a liable employer is covered by workers’ comp insurance is the first issue that must be addressed in choosing to seek compensation for your loading dock injury in Texas.
If you are injured while on-the-job at a loading dock and your employer is covered by workers compensation insurance, you will have to seek compensation for your injury through the workers compensation insurance policy. While this means that you will likely receive some type of compensation for your injury at some point in the future, such compensation is often not quite enough to cover the actual financial losses that you’ve incurred as a result of your injury, such as medical bills or lost wages due to time off from work. Furthermore, the workers comp process is often a bureaucratic and laborious process filled with mountains of paperwork. A Houston workers comp lawyer can help you through this process where necessary. However, a Houston work-injury attorney may also be able to help you identify other possible liable parties involved in your loading dock accident that are not covered by workers compensation insurance. Since these parties can be litigated against, the compensation possibly received from these other liable parties may assist in making up for the deficit that often exists between a victim’s incurred damages, i.e. financial losses, and the amount of compensation they’ve received through a workers comp policy.
If you’ve been injured on a loading dock and your employer is not covered by workers compensation insurance, then you can bring a personal injury lawsuit against your employer. With the help of an experienced Houston personal injury lawyer like Michael Grossman, you could then stand to be fully and fairly compensated for your loading dock injury. However, since many Texas employers have a fair understanding of workers comp law, some non-subscribers may attempt to act as if they are subscribers so that an injured victim will assume that they cannot bring a lawsuit against their employer. Managers and other co-workers that you may assume would know the answer as to whether or not your employer carries workers comp insurance may not know the true answer, or may hesitate in providing you with a definitive answer. In these instances, assessing an employer’s workers comp status may often only be accomplished with the help of a Houston workers comp attorney who can investigate the matter. Some non-subscribers have even gone so far as to offer payments out of their own pockets while suggesting to an injured victim that such payment is coming from a workers comp insurance policy.
Certain challenges can arise when seeking compensation against a non-subscriber for a loading dock injury. Since loading dock accidents can often result in severe personal injury, such as a traumatic brain injury as previously described, the damages incurred by a victim can often be quite high. Even though a non-subscribing employer is not covered by workers comp insurance, it’s likely that they’ll be covered by some other form of insurance. In these instances, such a policy may be worth quite a sizable sum. Consequently, insurance adjusters sent to work such a large-sum claim will work toward having the claim denied or diminished so that their company does not have to pay out such a large sum in compensation. Furthermore, they will likely have defense attorneys on call that can quickly investigate the scene of an accident so that the liable company might be able to be cleared of any or all liability. Ensure that you have legal help on your side that has both the experience and the ability to act quickly so that a strong case can be built on your behalf. Going against such insurers and defense attorneys is best left to attorneys that have proven themselves time and time again against such stout defensive teams.
Contractors with Loading Dock Injuries
Loading dock injuries in Houston may often involve contractors or other types of workers that are not directly employed by the owner of the loading dock or transportation service using the loading dock. Since contractors are responsible for their own safety while on-the-job, contractors that have been injured due to another entity’s negligence may be confused about their legal rights or frustrated with the fact that they may not be able to seek proper compensation for their loading dock injury. However, Texas law includes an expansive definition of an employee, and if an employee-employer relationship can be established under the law, then a negligent employer can be held liable for a worker’s injury, even if that worker had been called a contractor from the outset of their job. The following statements can be used to help determine a worker’s status as an employee rather than a contractor:
- The employer withheld social security or taxes from the worker’s paycheck.
- The employer paid the worker through a salary or through an hourly wage, as opposed to the worker being paid per job completed.
- The employer employed the worker for an indefinite amount of time, as opposed to the worker being employed to complete a specific job.
- The employer asked the worker to sign a document, such as an employee handbook or an agreement to be drug-tested, that limited the worker’s work-related rights.
- The employer oversaw the worker’s work while they were working, as opposed to looking over the work after the work was completed.
- The employer provided a specific schedule for the worker to follow.
- The employer provided tools and equipment for the worker’s job, as opposed to the worker furnishing their own tools and equipment.
If any of the above statements are true, a legitimate employee-employer relationship can likely be claimed. Consequently, an injured worker could then seek compensation from such an employer through the routes previously mentioned, dependent on whether or not the employer is covered by workers comp. If you’re a contractor that has suffered a loading dock injury in Houston, an experienced Houston work accident attorney like Michael Grossman may be able to assist you in defining your employment status so that you can seek proper compensation from a negligent party.
Loading Dock Injuries and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
When severe accidents occur in the workplace, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration may open their own investigation into the accident. Many people erroneously assume that such an investigation may be beneficial to their personal injury case for a loading dock accident. That is seldom the case. Such an investigation is most often conducted with an eye toward preventing future, similar accidents from occurring, and not with an eye toward the rights of the injured victim receiving proper compensation for their injury. Furthermore, OSHA investigations can sometimes take time to be completed and reports generated from such investigations are often written from a high level that is seldom concerned with the needs of an injured worker following the accident. While OSHA serves a worthy purpose to prevent future workplace accidents, a third-party investigation is often more beneficial to an aggrieved party in order to hold all liable parties accountable for their negligence. With two decades of work-injury accident experience in Texas, Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices can conduct a thorough investigation of your loading dock accident site in order to ascertain proper liability so that you can stand to be rightfully compensated for your injury from all parties that may have contributed to the accident.
Contact Houston Workplace Injury Attorney Michael Grossman for Help With Your Loading Dock Accident Personal Injury Case
As a word of caution, refrain from signing any documents that your employer or an insurance company may foist upon you in the aftermath of a loading dock injury. Such a document is often a release of liability offered in exchange for the promise of forthcoming compensation. It is a first-gasp effort in an attempt to thwart any possible legal proceedings. However, such compensation, if it ever arrives, is often much less than what will likely cover the full extent of your incurred damages, and is often much less than what could be rightfully be obtained through a personal injury lawsuit. A key warning sign in such instances is if some form of compensation has been offered before you’re aware of the full extent of your injuries. If such a document is signed, as the promise of some compensation quickly can often be more alluring than seeking full compensation in time, there is little that can be done in the legal realm to seek further compensation since the victim has signed away their rights to do so. A Houston work-related accident lawyer can look over such documents to ensure that you’re not being taken advantage of by an employer or an insurance company that would rather make cheap and quick work of your claim.
The Houston work injury law firm of Grossman Law Offices has the experience, knowledge, and reputation to capably assist you in seeking compensation for your loading dock injury. Such compensation may be able to go toward medical bills, both past and future, lost wages due to time off from work, lost earning capacity if unable to return to work, legal fees, pain and suffering, or other incurred damages. Furthermore, we’ve taken cases against every major insurance company in the nation, so they’re aware of our track record in regards to the successful outcomes we’ve been able to obtain on behalf of our clients. Since they’re familiar with our work injury law firm, they’re often willing to work with us to reach a mutually agreeable settlement in which a client may be fairly compensated without having to step foot into a courtroom. However, if a trial case is necessary, we’ll be ready to defend your rights in that setting as well. Contact Grossman Law Offices at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) if you’ve suffered a Houston loading dock injury. We offer free legal consultations where you can ask further questions about your legal options so that you might be able to start the legal process to seek due compensation for your loading dock injury.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$75,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$350.00
$350.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workers' Compensation Gross Negligence
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Work Injury (Facial Fractures and Head Trauma)
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$9,807.00
$9,807.00
$1,450,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Brain Injury)
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Total Recovery:
$1,450,000.00
$1,450,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$560,000.00
$560,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$31,410.00
$31,410.00
$150,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
Total Recovery:
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$341.00
$341.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Closed-Head Injury)
A painter fell from an apartment balcony resulting in a closed-head injury and other minor bodily injuries. The case was successfully resolved through litigation against the plaintiff's employer and the general contractor.
A painter fell from an apartment balcony resulting in a closed-head injury and other minor bodily injuries. The case was successfully resolved through litigation against the plaintiff's employer and the general contractor.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$20,465.00
$20,465.00
$226,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Shoulder Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Total Recovery:
$226,000.00
$226,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$84,000.00
$84,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,500.00
$5,500.00
$1,010,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Hand Lacerations)
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
Total Recovery:
$1,010,000.00
$1,010,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,300.00
$333,300.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident
Major freight train company sued as the result of an incident which claimed the life of an employee. Our attorneys settled the case outside of court for a confidential amount.
Major freight train company sued as the result of an incident which claimed the life of an employee. Our attorneys settled the case outside of court for a confidential amount.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential









