- Home
- Practice Areas
- Personal Injury Information
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyer
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Statute of Limitations
- What Makes Up a Strong Case?
- Personal Injury Damages
- Personal Injury Categories
- Vicarious Liability
- Injury Attorneys in Houston
- Houston Premises Liability
- Child Injury Cases in Houston
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Burn and Scald Injury
- Free Online Legal Advice
- Houston Personal Injury Law Firm
- Conroe Personal Injury Attorney
- Missouri City Personal Injuries
- More...
- Houston Pro Bono Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Accident Claim
- Houston PI Lawyer
- Houston Personal Injury Law Attorney
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Amputation Accidents in Houston
- Houston Personal Injury Legal Advice
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Houston Personal Injury Lawyers
- Houston Personal Injury Attorneys
- Mitigating Damages After an Injury
- Proving the Proximate Cause
- Thin Skull Rule
- Broken Bones
- Mediation in an Injury Lawsuit
- Houston Personal Injury Law
- Subrogation Reimbursement
- Best Injury Lawyer in Houston
- Clear Lake Personal Injury Lawyer
- Deer Park Personal Injury Attorney
- Galveston Personal Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena Personal Injury Attorney
- Sugar Land Personal Injury Lawyer
- Texas City Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death Information
- Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Statute of Limitations
- Texas Wrongful Death Law
- Texas Survival Statute
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Truck Accident Fatalities
- Plane and Aviation Fatalities
- Houston Fatal Boating Accidents
- Motorycle Accident Wrongful Death Cases
- Houston Work Related Death Cases
- Fatal Construction Accidents in Houston Texas
- Fatal Pedestrian Accidents in Houston
- Houston Elderly Wrongful Deaths
- Conroe Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Deer Park Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Galveston Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Pasadena Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Sugar Land Wrongful Death Lawyer
- 18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
- Houston Trucking Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Info
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Trucking Accident Claim
- Cargo Related Trucking Accidents
- Intoxicated Truck Driver Accidents
- Unsafe Trucking Company Practices
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents in Houston
- Accidents Caused by Defective Truck Tires
- Conroe 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Houston Fatal Truck Accident Attorney
- Galveston Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Dump Truck Accidents
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
- Accidents with Construction Vehicles
- Houston Truck Crash Attorney
- Sugar Land Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Injury Lawyer
- Pasadena 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Houston Truck Accident Lawyers
- Houston Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Big Rig Accidents in Houston
- Houston Truck Attorney
- Houston 18-Wheeler Attorney
- Conroe Truck Accident Lawyer
- Galveston 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Pasadena Truck Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Clear Lake Truck Accident Lawyer
- Deer Park Truck Accident Lawyer
- Houston Truck Accident Lawsuits
- Texas City 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Houston Automobile Accident Attorney
- How the Claims Process Works
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Denied Car Insurance Claims
- Damages Available in a Car Accident
- Negligent Entrustment of a Vehicle
- Injury to a Child
- Rollover Accidents
- Can You Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- Auto Accident Attorney in Houston
- Conroe Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Houston Auto Accident Attorney
- How Property Damage Affects Your Personal Injury Claim
- Rear End Collision
- Head, Neck and Back Injuries
- Soft Tissue Injuries
- Car Accidents Resulting in Psychological Damages
- Accidents Caused by Drivers on Their Cell Phone
- Getting a Rental Car
- We can help you get Medical Attention
- How to Handle a Car Accident Claim
- Houston Insurance Attorney
- How Uninsured and Underinsured Claims Work
- How Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Works
- How Witness Statements Affect Your Claim
- Accident Mediation Process
- How to Handle Disputed Liability
- Clear Lake Car Accident Lawyer
- Galveston Car Accident Lawyer
- Houston Accident Attorney
- Houston Accident Injury Lawyer
- Houston Car Accident Lawyer
- Pasadena Car Accident Lawyer
- Sugar Land Car Accident Lawyer
- Texas City Car Accident Lawyer
- Drunk Driving Accidents
- Houston Drunk Driver Accident Lawyer
- Dram Shop and Liquor Liability Cases in Houston
- Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents
- Galveston Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas Drunk Driver Accident Statistics
- Conroe Drunken Driver Accidents
- Pasadena Drunk Driving Accidents
- Sugar Land Drunk Driver Accidents
- Texas City Drunk Driving Accidents
- On The Job Injuries
- On the Job Injury Attorney
- Worker's Compensation
- Non Subscriber Cases
- Injuries Caused by Machinery
- Houston Drilling Accident Injury
- Houston Mesothelioma Attorney
- Forklift Injury Cases Houston Texas
- Pasadena Work Injury Lawyer
- Slip and Fall Accidents
- Conroe Work Injury Lawyer
- Houston Lifting Injury
- More...
- Industrial Accidents
- Houston Warehouse Injury Attorneys
- Shiping and Receiving Dock Injuries
- Houston Carpal Tunnel Office Injuries
- Houston Delivery Driver Injuries
- Subscriber Claims and Workers Compensation
- Loading Dock Accidents and Waterfront Injuries
- Houston Oilfield Injuries
- Toxic Exposure and Asbestos Cases
- Galveston Work Injury Lawyer
- Sugar Land Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Job Site Injury Attorneys
- Workers Compensation Cases in Houston Texas
- Houston Non Subscriber Cases
- Construction Site Hazards
- Heavy Equipment Injuries in Houston
- Electric Shock Cases in Houston Texas
- Crush Injuries on Houston Construction Sites
- Power Tools Injuries and Accidents in Houston Texas
- Houston Trench Collapse Attorney
- More...
- Trench Collapses in Houston Texas
- Houston Hazardous Chemical Exposure
- Construction Accidents Caused by Equipment Malfunction
- Scaffolding Accidents and Injuries in Houston
- Houston Road Worker Injuries
- On the Job Burn Injuries
- Houston Crane Accidents
- Fallling Injuries in Houston
- Structure Collapse Cases Houston Texas
- Maritime Injuries
- Product Defect Liability
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injuries
- Day Care Child Abuse
- Drowning Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Personal Injury Information
- Successes
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer
Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help You Seek Justice for Your Loved One’s Loss

When an accident occurs resulting in a fatality, and that accident has been caused by the negligent behavior of a person or entity, the victim’s family members can seek compensation and justice for their loss through a wrongful death lawsuit.
However, pursuing such legal action against a negligent party can prove challenging without the help of an experienced Houston wrongful death lawyer like Michael Grossman. With twenty years of experience in helping families just like yours, Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices are ready to come alongside you during this difficult time so that you can stand to be fairly compensated for the financial losses you’ve incurred as a result of losing a loved one due to another person’s or entity’s negligence. By pursuing a wrongful death claim against a negligent party or parties, a victim’s family will also be working to ensure that a future fatal accident does not have to occur to another family due to the party’s continued negligent behavior. While we work to earn full and fair compensation for our clients, we also want to help prevent further fatal accidents from occurring as well, so that other families do not have to also suffer.
Wrongful death lawsuits work to hold negligent parties accountable for their actions, regardless of if these actions were criminal in nature. In other words, civil legal action can be pursued against a negligent party, even if criminal action is already being pursued against a negligent party. Furthermore, wrongful deaths can occur as the result of multiple liable parties, which means that multiple, unique cases may have to be built against each unique defendant. In these instances, such liable parties are often only discovered through an exhaustive investigation process. With twenty years of investigative experience into wrongful death accidents, the Houston wrongful death law firm of Grossman Law Offices is well-prepared to help you identify all liable parties so that they can be held accountable for their role in your loved one’s loss.
Wrongful Death Cases in Houston Texas
The main issue at stake in any wrongful death case is whether or not a defendant owed a legal duty to a victim and subsequently violated that legal duty, resulting in the death of the victim. Legal duties are highly dependent on the circumstances of an accident, as well as the relationship of the people or entities involved in the accident. As an example, a surgeon violates their legal duty toward you if they slice you with a knife while you’re both in line at a restaurant. However, no such legal duty is violated if the same surgery slices you with a knife while you’re undergoing voluntary surgery at their hospital. While the sustained injury is identical in each instance, the circumstances surrounding the accident are wholly different, thus resulting in the difference as to whether or not a legal duty was owed and violated. Such a duty and its violation must both be proven in order for a wrongful death case to result in a favorable outcome for the plaintiff. In other words, it must be shown how the defendant’s negligence resulted in or contributed to the death of the plaintiff’s loved one. Houston wrongful death lawyer Michael Grossman has two decades of experience in proving such cases.
Furthermore, a family member that has lost a loved one must pursue legal action against a negligent party, as opposed to waiting for compensation to be awarded to them by the negligent party. In other words, the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff’s shoulders, which means that the plaintiff’s legal representation must be able to show that the defendant caused, or contributed to, the fatal accident. Since a decedent is unable to speak for themselves, a wrongful death claim must often be substantiated by a robust case created from relevant evidence and key witness testimony. Houston wrongful death lawyer Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices can conduct thorough investigations into fatal accident sites so that all liable parties are identified and held accountable so that you can stand to be fairly compensated by all parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident.
Texas Wrongful Death Damages
Damages is a legal term that simply refers to financial losses sustained by a victim. For instance, damages does not refer to an actual injury, but to the costs associated with that injury. In Texas wrongful death claims, there are two types of damages that can be sought, known as survival damages and wrongful death damages. Survival damages relate to the damages that a decedent would have incurred had they survived the fatal accident. Wrongful death damages relate to the damages incurred by the family members that have lost a loved one. Both types of damages can be sought in wrongful death claims, although only certain family members can seek each type.
Survival Damages in Texas Wrongful Death Cases
Survival damages can only be sought by a decedent’s closest living family member, in descending order from spouse, to child, to parents, to siblings. Survival damages can be sought for the decedent’s:
- Medical bills
- Property damage bills
- Lost wages
- Lost future wages
- Emotional or mental distress
- Pain and suffering
Did You Know?

Our Houston wrongful death attorneys have won thousands of cases. Call us today to discuss your case. 1-855-392-0000
Justifying survival damages can be challenging for lesser experienced lawyers since the amount sought can be somewhat subjective. For example, it can be quite challenging to prove what a decedent would have incurred in terms of pain and suffering had they survived an accident. However, with 20 years of experience in being able to calculate survival damages in Texas wrongful death cases, Houston Texas wrongful death lawyer Michael Grossman will work to ensure that these damages are faithfully calculated so that an aggrieved family can be rightfully compensated for their loss.
Wrongful Death Damages in Texas Wrongful Death Cases
Wrongful death damages can only be sought by certain family members, including a spouse, a child, a parent, or, in rare instances, a sibling. Wrongful death damages can be sought on behalf of the family members that have lost a loved one for:
- Medical bills that occurred before the victim’s death
- Funeral costs
- Loss of financial support
- Mental or emotional distress caused by their loss
Proving both types of damages is a vital step in any Texas wrongful death case since the amount of damages calculated and proven equals the amount of compensation that the plaintiff is seeking from a negligent party. If such damages are not correctly calculated, a grieving family may not be fully compensated for their loss. This can be especially detrimental to the financial stability of a family who has lost a loved one that was the primary wage-earner for the household.
Challenges in Texas Wrongful Death Cases
Seeking compensation and justice for your loved one’s wrongful death can present certain challenges, but these challenges should not prevent you from seeking restitution for your loved one’s loss. With the capable help of an experienced Houston wrongful death lawyer like Michael Grossman, who is familiar with the seeming challenges of wrongful death cases and the technicalities often involved in workers’ compensation claims, you will have a knowledgeable legal ally on your side that will defend your rights so that you can stand to be fully and fairly compensated for your loss.
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Status
One of the first issues that must be addressed in a Texas wrongful death lawsuit is the workers’ comp status of the employer at fault. The answer to this question, whether or not an employer is a subscriber or a non-subscriber to workers compensation insurance, is foundational to the pursuit of compensation for a wrongful death. If an employer is a subscriber, i.e. they are covered by workers’ compensation insurance, then an aggrieved family cannot bring a wrongful death lawsuit against the employer, unless the employer was grossly negligent. However, if a liable employer is a non-subscriber, i.e. they are not covered by worker’s compensation insurance, then an aggrieved family can bring a wrongful death lawsuit against the negligent company, regardless of the type of negligence exercised by the employer.
Gross Negligence by a Workers’ Comp Employer
If a subscribing employer was grossly negligent in their actions and such behavior led to a worker’s death, the one exception to worker’s comp law comes into play in regards to when an aggrieved party can sue a subscribing employer. However, proving gross negligence requires a high standard of proof since a plaintiff’s legal representation must be able to prove that an employer had previous knowledge that a fatal accident had a high probability of occurring and yet did little to nothing to prevent such an accident from happening. For instance, if a safety harness was known to have previously malfunctioned resulting in the serious injury of a worker and the employer did nothing to fix or replace the harness and another worker was killed while using the same harness, an argument for gross negligence could be made. However, proving gross negligence can be quite challenging for those unfamiliar with the concept or without previous experience in similar cases. Houston TX wrongful death lawyer Michael Grossman has 20 such years of experience in wrongful death cases against grossly negligent employers.
Standard Negligence by a Workers’ Comp Employer
On the other hand, if a worker dies due to standard negligence, like a moment of distraction, and works for a subscribing employer, then the aggrieved family can only seek restitution for their loss through the workers’ compensation insurance policy. Unfortunately, the compensation often awarded through such a policy is often much less than what can adequately cover the damages that a family has incurred due to their loss. However, the shortfall between compensation received through a workers’ comp policy and your incurred damages can often be made up by identifying other liable parties that are not covered by such a policy. For example, industrial accidents and Houston on-the-job accidents can often have multiple liable parties, such as co-workers or other people or entities, and these parties will not be covered by a workers’ comp policy, which means that some compensation, based on that person’s or entity’s percentage of liability for the accident, can be sought from them through a wrongful death lawsuit. When Grossman Law Offices is hired for a work-related wrongful death, we make sure to conduct a thorough investigation into an accident site so that all liable parties are properly identified so that they can be held proportionately accountable for their negligent behavior leading to a wrongful death.
Negligence by a Non-subscribing Employer
Texas does not mandate that all companies must be covered by workers’ compensation insurance. However, the laws are written in such a way that the companies that do not choose to be covered by workers’ comp often must pay a heavy price when it comes to a wrongful death occurring at their work sites. For example, non-subscribers are only offered one specific defensive measure, known as the sole proximate cause defense, when a wrongful death lawsuit is brought against them. This defensive measure means that the legal representation for the defense must pin 100 percent of the liability for the accident onto the victim. Such an inquest can be quite disheartening for a family that has recently lost a loved one, since the defense will attempt to call into question the worker’s ability to competently perform his or her job. However, proving sole proximate cause is often difficult because it requires a high standard of proof on behalf of the defense team. As a result, the burden of proof on behalf of the plaintiff is often low in wrongful death cases against non-subscribers in Texas. However, the help of an experienced Texas wrongful death attorney is often still necessary in order to ensure that the burden of proof is met and that a strong case has been built on behalf of yourself and your lost loved one.
Aggressive Defense Teams and Insurance Adjusters
Insurance polices that are involved in wrongful death cases can often be quite expensive, resulting in a stout defensive team being put together to represent the insurance company’s best interests. Additionally, highly trained insurance adjusters will likely work the claim, and they will do so with an eye toward getting the claim denied, thus saving their company the most amount possible. If the claim cannot be denied, i.e. if blame cannot be placed onto any other parties for the accident, then they will work to have the claim amount severely lessened. Furthermore, defense attorneys in wrongful death cases will likely be just as experienced with many years of prior, similar casework. In other words, they’ll know more than a few ways to see your case dismissed or your compensation package severely decreased. Ensure that this doesn’t have the likelihood of happening to you by enlisting the help of Houston wrongful death lawyer Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices. With 20 years of prior experience in Texas wrongful death cases, Mr. Grossman is ready to come alongside you during this difficult time in order to ensure that you’re compensated for your incurred damages and to see to it that all liable parties are brought to justice for their negligent behavior resulting in your loss.
Contact Houston Wrongful Death Lawyer Michael Grossman for Help With Your Texas Wrongful Death Case

If you’ve lost a loved one due to the negligent behavior of another person or entity, don’t hesitate to contact our law offices today at 1-855-392-0000 (toll free) for a free, private legal consultation. We’ll listen to you and answer any questions you might have about the legal process to seek justice and to seek compensation for your loss. We’ll also provide you with possible legal options in regards to the specifics of your case. Furthermore, contacting us quickly in the aftermath of a fatal accident can often prove to be vitally important toward the successful outcome of a wrongful death case. For instance, pertinent evidence can go missing as the days pass. Some evidence can even be manipulated or deleted by those that would rather not be implicated in your loved one’s death. Key witnesses can become difficult to track down as time passes too. When Grossman Law Offices is hired to look into a wrongful death, we’ll investigate the accident site in order to gather such evidence and talk to such witnesses. Since the decedent cannot speak for themselves, it’s important that relevant evidence is acquired so that a robust case can speak for them.
With 20 years of practical work in Texas wrongful death cases, Houston fatality attorney Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices stand ready to serve you through defending your rights against even the toughest of opponents. We understand that this is likely a difficult, emotional, and trying time for you, but waiting any longer to contact us could ultimately prove detrimental to your case. Ensure that those who were negligent in your loved one’s death don’t have the opportunity to exercise the same kind of negligence which could lead to another family’s suffering. Contact Grossman Law Offices today so that you can stand to be compensated for hospital bills, funeral expenses, your pain and suffering, and other incurred damages, and so that justice can be served in light of your personal loss.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$300,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Third Party Dram Shop
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$370.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workers' Compensation Gross Negligence
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$3,200,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
Our attorneys were hired to represent the family of a middle aged woman who was killed in a car accident. The incident occurred as another vehicle struck the car that the decedent was a passenger in, head-on on the passenger side. The impact resulted in catastrophic injuries which claimed the life of the decedent.
Our attorneys were hired soon after the accident and we launched a full investigation. Through the course of our investigation, it was soon determined that the head-on collision was caused a failed component in the defendant's vehicle (the particulars of which cannot be elaborated upon per the resolution agreement). Suit was filed against the manufacturer of said component and litigation commenced. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Our attorneys were hired to represent the family of a middle aged woman who was killed in a car accident. The incident occurred as another vehicle struck the car that the decedent was a passenger in, head-on on the passenger side. The impact resulted in catastrophic injuries which claimed the life of the decedent.
Our attorneys were hired soon after the accident and we launched a full investigation. Through the course of our investigation, it was soon determined that the head-on collision was caused a failed component in the defendant's vehicle (the particulars of which cannot be elaborated upon per the resolution agreement). Suit was filed against the manufacturer of said component and litigation commenced. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$3,200,000.00
$3,200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$1,280,000.00
$1,280,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$400,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Medical Malpractice
A young handicapped woman lost her life when a long-term care facility failed to provide her with treatment for obvious symptoms of severe illness. The defendants maintained that there were no outwardly visible signs of illness. The medical evidence showed otherwise. The case was successfully resolved through litigation, though damages caps imposed by tort reform were a factor.
A young handicapped woman lost her life when a long-term care facility failed to provide her with treatment for obvious symptoms of severe illness. The defendants maintained that there were no outwardly visible signs of illness. The medical evidence showed otherwise. The case was successfully resolved through litigation, though damages caps imposed by tort reform were a factor.
Total Recovery:
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$1,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.
Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.
Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.
Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.
Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.
The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.
Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.
Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.
Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.
Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.
Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.
The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.
Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
Total Recovery:
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,333.00
$333,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$150,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
Total Recovery:
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$341.00
$341.00
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00








